DOI 10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.03.010
Physiological movement disorder-like features during typical motor development.
Аннотация
AIM: To compare physiological age-relatedness between dyskinesia (dystonia/choreoathetosis), dystonia and ataxia rating scale scores in healthy children.
METHOD: Three movement disorders specialists quantified dyskinetic-like features in healthy children (n = 52; 4-16 years) using the Dyskinesia Impairment Scale (DIS = DIS-choreoathetosis (DIS-C) + DIS-dystonia (DIS-D)). We compared the age-related regression coefficients of the DIS with data processed from previous studies on dystonia and ataxia rating scales (Burke-Fahn-Marsden Movement and Disability Scales (BFMMS and BFMDS) and Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) and Brief Ataxia Rating Scale (BARS)).
RESULTS
Dyskinetic scores were obtained in 79% (DIS); 65% (DIS-D) and 17% (DIS-C) versus dystonic and ataxic scores in 98% (BFMMS) and 89% (SARA/ICARS/BARS) of the children. Age-related DIS and DIS-D scores (B = -0.90 and 0.77; p < 0.001) were correlated with age-related BFMMS scores (B = -0.49; p < 0.001; r = 0.87; p < 0.001), whereas DIS-C scores were age-independent. Ataxic scores revealed stronger age-related regression coefficients than dyskinetic and dystonic scores (4-8 years; p < 0.05).
INTERPRETATION: In healthy children, comparison between physiological dyskinesia, dystonia and ataxia rating scale scores revealed: 1. inverse age-relatedness for dystonic and ataxic scores, but not for choreoathetotic scores, 2. interrelated dystonic DIS-D and BFMMS scores, 3. the strongest age-related expression by ataxic scores. In healthy children, these physiological movement disorder-like features are interpreted as an expression of the developing underlying motor centres.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.