Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2017
Diagnostic performance between contrast enhancement, proton MR spectroscopy, and amide proton transfer imaging in patients with brain tumors.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sakata Akihiko, Fushimi Yasutaka, Okada Tomohisa, Arakawa Yoshiki, Kunieda Takeharu, Minamiguchi Sachiko, Kido Aki, Sakashita Naotaka, Miyamoto Susumu, Togashi Kaori
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To explore the relationship among parameters of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and amide proton transfer (APT) imaging, and to assess the diagnostic performance of MRS and APT imaging for grading brain tumors in comparison with contrast enhancement of conventional MRI for preoperative grading in patients with brain tumor.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent were obtained. Forty-one patients with suspected brain tumors were enrolled in the study. Single-voxel MRS and 2D APT imaging of the same slice level were conducted using a 3T MRI scanner. Positive or negative contrast enhancement on T1 -weighted images was assessed by two neuroradiologists. Correlations among metabolite concentrations, metabolite ratios, and calculated histogram parameters, including mean APT (APTmean ) and the 90th percentile of APT (APT90 ) were assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Diagnostic performance was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for contrast enhancement and MRS and APT imaging. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Positive correlations with statistical significance were found between total concentration of choline (Cho) and APT90 (r = 0.49), and between Cho/creatine (Cr) and APTmean (r = 0.65) as well as APT90 (r = 0.49). A negative correlation with statistical significance was observed between NAA/Cr and APTmean (r = -0.52). According to ROC curves, Cho/Cr, APTmean , APT90 , demonstrated higher area under the curve (AUC) values than that of contrast enhancement in grading gliomas.
CONCLUSION: Significant correlations were observed between metabolite concentrations and ratios on MRS and APT values. MRS and APT imaging showed comparable diagnostic capability for grading brain tumors, suggesting that both MRS and APT imaging offer potential for quantitatively assessing similar biological characteristics in brain tumors on noncontrast MRI.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;46:732-739.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent were obtained. Forty-one patients with suspected brain tumors were enrolled in the study. Single-voxel MRS and 2D APT imaging of the same slice level were conducted using a 3T MRI scanner. Positive or negative contrast enhancement on T1 -weighted images was assessed by two neuroradiologists. Correlations among metabolite concentrations, metabolite ratios, and calculated histogram parameters, including mean APT (APTmean ) and the 90th percentile of APT (APT90 ) were assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Diagnostic performance was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for contrast enhancement and MRS and APT imaging. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Positive correlations with statistical significance were found between total concentration of choline (Cho) and APT90 (r = 0.49), and between Cho/creatine (Cr) and APTmean (r = 0.65) as well as APT90 (r = 0.49). A negative correlation with statistical significance was observed between NAA/Cr and APTmean (r = -0.52). According to ROC curves, Cho/Cr, APTmean , APT90 , demonstrated higher area under the curve (AUC) values than that of contrast enhancement in grading gliomas.
CONCLUSION: Significant correlations were observed between metabolite concentrations and ratios on MRS and APT values. MRS and APT imaging showed comparable diagnostic capability for grading brain tumors, suggesting that both MRS and APT imaging offer potential for quantitatively assessing similar biological characteristics in brain tumors on noncontrast MRI.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;46:732-739.