World neurosurgery · 2016
Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma in Children: Document or Treat?
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pierre-Aurélien Beuriat, Alexandru Szathmari, Federico Di Rocco, Justyna Kanold, Carmine Mottolese, Didier Frappaz
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The place of stereotactic biopsies in the management of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs) in children has changed over the years. Nonetheless, stereotactic biopsy remains a surgical procedure with its risks. One complication that has not been reported previously in case of a biopsy of a DIPG is metastatic seeding along the tract of the biopsy. We report the first 2 cases in the literature.
CASE DESCRIPTION: One 8-year-old and one 9-year-old boy were admitted for a typical DIPG. Parents choose to be included into a research protocol that required a stereotactic biopsy. The biopsy was performed in both cases without any intraoperative complications, and they both received their treatment according to protocol. Unfortunately, 3 and 1 months respectively after the biopsy, their clinical condition deteriorated. MRI showed a metastatic seeding along the tract of the biopsy, and both patients died of disease progression.
CONCLUSIONS: The era of targeted therapy with molecular and genomic discoveries has paved the way to a research protocol that requires a biopsy from the patient. The reported complications have never been described before. The purpose of this paper is not to suggest that no biopsy should be performed when a DIPG is suspected. For now, biopsy remains investigational, because no benefit in survival could be drawn so far for any patient. This subject deserves honest discussion with the children and their parents.
CASE DESCRIPTION: One 8-year-old and one 9-year-old boy were admitted for a typical DIPG. Parents choose to be included into a research protocol that required a stereotactic biopsy. The biopsy was performed in both cases without any intraoperative complications, and they both received their treatment according to protocol. Unfortunately, 3 and 1 months respectively after the biopsy, their clinical condition deteriorated. MRI showed a metastatic seeding along the tract of the biopsy, and both patients died of disease progression.
CONCLUSIONS: The era of targeted therapy with molecular and genomic discoveries has paved the way to a research protocol that requires a biopsy from the patient. The reported complications have never been described before. The purpose of this paper is not to suggest that no biopsy should be performed when a DIPG is suspected. For now, biopsy remains investigational, because no benefit in survival could be drawn so far for any patient. This subject deserves honest discussion with the children and their parents.