MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.21037/apm-21-3420

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of palliative medicine · 2022

Characteristics from the 100 most influential articles on carotid stenosis.

Hwang Ji Woong, Jun Heungman

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

There are three main competing treatment modalities for carotid artery stenosis (CS), i.e., carotid endarterectomy (CEA), carotid artery angioplasty/stenting (CAS), and medical treatment. In this study, we analyzed the performance and trends of CS research through bibliometric analysis.

METHODS

We searched the Thomson Reuters Web of Science citation indexing database. The key words used in the search were "carotid artery" and "carotid stenosis". The top 100 most cited manuscripts (T100) were analyzed based on title, author, institution, country of origin, year of publication, and topic.

RESULTS

The T100 were published between 1990 and 2016. The Stroke published the most manuscripts (n=22) and the New England Journal of Medicine was the most cited (n=15,113). The United States had the greatest number of publications (n=43), and the University of Oxford was the institution with the most publications (n=7). Peter M. Rothwell was the corresponding author with the most publications (n=10). The main topics were in the following categories: CEA (n=22), medication (n=11), CAS (n=9), diagnosis (n=44), and CEA vs. CAS (n=14).

CONCLUSIONS

This bibliometric analysis of CS research provides insight into publication trends and perspective on the treatment of CS.

Для цитирования: Hwang Ji Woong, Jun Heungman. Characteristics from the 100 most influential articles on carotid stenosis.. Annals of palliative medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-3420.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.