DOI 10.1007/s00247-021-05226-1
Non-inferiority of a non-gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging follow-up protocol for isolated optic pathway gliomas.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Pediatric patients with optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) typically undergo a large number of follow-up MRI brain exams with gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM), which have been associated with gadolinium tissue retention. Therefore, careful consideration of GBCM use in these children is warranted.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate whether GBCM is necessary for OPG MR imaging response assessment using a blinded, non-inferiority, multi-reader study.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
We identified children with OPG and either stable disease or change in tumor size on MRI using a regional cancer registry serving the U.S. Pacific Northwest. For each child, the two relevant, consecutive MRI studies were anonymized and standardized into two imaging sets excluding or including GBCM-enhanced images. Exam pairs were compiled from 42 children with isolated OPG (19 with neurofibromatosis type 1), from a population of 106 children with OPG. We included 28 exam pairs in which there was a change in size between exams. Seven pediatric radiologists measured tumor sizes during three blinded sessions, spaced by at least 1 week. The first measuring session excluded GBCM-enhanced sequences; the others did not. The primary endpoint was intra-reader agreement for ≥ 25% change in axial cross-product measurement, using a 12% non-inferiority threshold.
RESULTS
Analysis demonstrated an overall 1.2% difference (95% confidence interval, -3.2% to 5.5%) for intra-reader agreement using a non-GBCM-enhanced protocol and background variability.
CONCLUSION
A non-GBCM-enhanced protocol was non-inferior to a GBCM-enhanced protocol for assessing change in size of isolated OPGs on follow-up MRI exams.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.