MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/mdc3.14225

Медицинская библиотека · Movement disorders clinical practice · 2024

Examining Agreement in Psychotic Symptom Assessment: Insights from Parkinson's Disease Dementia Dyads.

Beehler Blake, Tosin Michelle H S, Stebbins Glenn T, Goetz Christopher G

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Psychosis and cognitive decline often co-occur in Parkinson's Disease (PD), which complicates assessment.

OBJECTIVE

We measured agreement between patients with PD and dementia (PDD) and care partners (CPs) in their independent evaluation of PD-related psychotic symptoms.

METHODS

We compared responses to a PD psychosis rating scale (SAPS-PD) in 21 dyads of patients with PDD and cognitively normal CPs. We assessed the concordance of responses using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Following the psychosis assessment, the clinician used all available information and adjudicated who provided the most reliable responses.

RESULTS

Dyads demonstrated poor concordance in summary scores (ICC = 0.464). Six of the nine individual items had poor agreement. The clinician adjudicated the patient's response as the more reliable in 71.4% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Although many psychotic symptoms are internal and not observable, in the context of PDD, both patient and CP inputs are valuable, but final adjudication favors patient responses.

Для цитирования: Beehler Blake, Tosin Michelle H S, Stebbins Glenn T, Goetz Christopher G. Examining Agreement in Psychotic Symptom Assessment: Insights from Parkinson's Disease Dementia Dyads.. Movement disorders clinical practice. 2024. DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.14225.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.