Frontiers in public health · 2025
Longitudinal network analysis of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder comorbidities among adolescents in regional China.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Heting, Liu Jiahe, Wang Yamin, Li Zhenchao, Mei Shiwei, Zhang Zigang, Fan Linlin, Jiang Lihua
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The network theory of mental disorders offers a new perspective for the understanding of comorbidities, but the research on the comorbidities among depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is still insufficient. The aim of this study was to explore the internal relationship by establishing and analyzing the comorbidity networks, and to provide suggestions for the intervention after traumatic events.
METHODS: We utilized data from the second and third wave of the Chengdu Positive Child Development cohort (N = 3,189, 47.79% female), we estimated to network models of depression, anxiety and PTSD. To assess difference in global connectivity between the two networks, we conducted invariance test.
RESULTS: K27 (Somatic 10), K37 (Generalized Anxiety 9), K15 (Somatic 5), K33 (Generalized Anxiety 7), K24 (Somatic 9) were the most central nodes in both networks, P13 (Sleep problem) had the highest Bridge Expected Influence value. The structural difference between the two networks was statistically significant (M = 0.229, p = 0.010), and the global strength of the network at wave 2 was higher than the network at wave 3 (35.1 vs. 33.9, S = 1.20, p = 0.010).
CONCLUSION: The correlation in symptoms of the three disorders underscores the need for more comprehensive treatment options for intervention after traumatic events. Central and bridge nodes could inform targeted interventions or policy decisions. Anxiety disorders, especially Som and Gen dimensions, should be the focus of intervention. The Arousal dimension in PTSD, especially sleep disorders, may contribute to the comorbidities. In addition, this study highlights the importance of staged post-traumatic interventions.
METHODS: We utilized data from the second and third wave of the Chengdu Positive Child Development cohort (N = 3,189, 47.79% female), we estimated to network models of depression, anxiety and PTSD. To assess difference in global connectivity between the two networks, we conducted invariance test.
RESULTS: K27 (Somatic 10), K37 (Generalized Anxiety 9), K15 (Somatic 5), K33 (Generalized Anxiety 7), K24 (Somatic 9) were the most central nodes in both networks, P13 (Sleep problem) had the highest Bridge Expected Influence value. The structural difference between the two networks was statistically significant (M = 0.229, p = 0.010), and the global strength of the network at wave 2 was higher than the network at wave 3 (35.1 vs. 33.9, S = 1.20, p = 0.010).
CONCLUSION: The correlation in symptoms of the three disorders underscores the need for more comprehensive treatment options for intervention after traumatic events. Central and bridge nodes could inform targeted interventions or policy decisions. Anxiety disorders, especially Som and Gen dimensions, should be the focus of intervention. The Arousal dimension in PTSD, especially sleep disorders, may contribute to the comorbidities. In addition, this study highlights the importance of staged post-traumatic interventions.