Translational behavioral medicine · 2025
Back to school: a qualitative study evaluating a community-informed COVID-19 risk communication intervention for rural elementary school children and their families.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Duran Miriana C, Shah Parth D, Bell-Brown Ari M, Rojina Janet, Glascock Morgan, Ramirez Magaly, Ibarra Genoveva, Garza Lorenzo, Linde Sandra, Bishop Sonia, Garrison Michelle M, Pascoe Kelley M, Drain Paul K, Zhou Chuan, Ko Linda K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: ReOpening Schools Safely and Educating Youth (ROSSEY) was a cluster randomized controlled trial of a risk communication intervention for COVID-19 prevention to promote safe return to school among students in a rural, agricultural community.
PURPOSE: This qualitative study evaluated the implementation of a risk communication intervention and a school district's COVID-19 testing program through parent focus groups and interviews with school staff and students.
METHODS: Parents (n = 37), students (n = 19), and school staff (n = 14) from seven schools that received the intervention shared their experience via focus groups and interviews informed by the RE-AIM framework. Deductive and inductive coding was conducted by four data analysts. Themes were validated with community members.
RESULTS: Parent focus groups, student and staff interviews provided insight into the ROSSEY study implementation. We identified five main themes: (i) social and financial drivers of participation; (ii) personal beliefs and unique challenges to research participation; (iii) intervention reinforced knowledge and shifted behavior; (iv) the appeal of comic books and videos supported adoption; and (v) multimodal communication and partnerships enhanced implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk communication intervention was deemed culturally appropriate, reinforced previous knowledge, and encouraged adoption of preventive behaviors. The partnership with the school district and collaboration with the district's COVID-19 testing program ensured success of recruitment, study implementation, and adoption of preventive behaviors.
PURPOSE: This qualitative study evaluated the implementation of a risk communication intervention and a school district's COVID-19 testing program through parent focus groups and interviews with school staff and students.
METHODS: Parents (n = 37), students (n = 19), and school staff (n = 14) from seven schools that received the intervention shared their experience via focus groups and interviews informed by the RE-AIM framework. Deductive and inductive coding was conducted by four data analysts. Themes were validated with community members.
RESULTS: Parent focus groups, student and staff interviews provided insight into the ROSSEY study implementation. We identified five main themes: (i) social and financial drivers of participation; (ii) personal beliefs and unique challenges to research participation; (iii) intervention reinforced knowledge and shifted behavior; (iv) the appeal of comic books and videos supported adoption; and (v) multimodal communication and partnerships enhanced implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk communication intervention was deemed culturally appropriate, reinforced previous knowledge, and encouraged adoption of preventive behaviors. The partnership with the school district and collaboration with the district's COVID-19 testing program ensured success of recruitment, study implementation, and adoption of preventive behaviors.