MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2215/cjn.12541019

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2020

Association of Socioeconomic Status and Comorbidities with Racial Disparities during Kidney Transplant Evaluation.

Murphy Karly A, Jackson John W, Purnell Tanjala S, Shaffer Ashton A, Haugen Christine E, Chu Nadia M, Crews Deidra C, Norman Silas P, Segev Dorry L, McAdams-DeMarco Mara A

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES

Black patients referred for kidney transplantation have surpassed many obstacles but likely face continued racial disparities before transplant. The mechanisms that underlie these disparities are unclear. We determined the contributions of socioeconomic status (SES) and comorbidities as mediators to disparities in listing and transplant.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We studied a cohort (n=1452 black; n=1561 white) of patients with kidney failure who were referred for and started the transplant process (2009-2018). We estimated the direct and indirect effects of SES (self-reported income, education, and employment) and medical comorbidities (self-reported and chart-abstracted) as mediators of racial disparities in listing using Cox proportional hazards analysis with inverse odds ratio weighting. Among the 983 black and 1085 white candidates actively listed, we estimated the direct and indirect effects of SES and comorbidities as mediators of racial disparities on receipt of transplant using Poisson regression with inverse odds ratio weighting.

RESULTS

Within the first year, 876 (60%) black and 1028 (66%) white patients were waitlisted. The relative risk of listing for black compared with white patients was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.69 to 0.83); after adjustment for SES and comorbidity, the relative risk was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.97). The proportion of the racial disparity in listing was explained by SES by 36% (95% CI, 26% to 57%), comorbidity by 44% (95% CI, 35% to 61%), and SES with comorbidity by 58% (95% CI, 44% to 85%). There were 409 (42%) black and 496 (45%) white listed candidates transplanted, with a median duration of follow-up of 3.9 (interquartile range, 1.2-7.1) and 2.8 (interquartile range, 0.8-6.3) years, respectively. The incidence rate ratio for black versus white candidates was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.96); SES and comorbidity did not explain the racial disparity.

CONCLUSIONS

SES and comorbidity partially mediated racial disparities in listing but not for transplant.

Для цитирования: Murphy Karly A, Jackson John W, Purnell Tanjala S, Shaffer Ashton A, Haugen Christine E, Chu Nadia M, Crews Deidra C, Norman Silas P, Segev Dorry L, McAdams-DeMarco Mara A. Association of Socioeconomic Status and Comorbidities with Racial Disparities during Kidney Transplant Evaluation.. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2020. DOI: 10.2215/cjn.12541019.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.