Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting the Treatment Effects of Headgear and/or Functional Appliance on the Maxillo-Mandibular Growth in Preadolescent Patients With Skeletal Class II Malocclusion.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting the effects of headgear (HG) and/or functional appliance (FA) on the maxillo-mandibular growth in preadolescent patients with skeletal Class II (C-II) malocclusion.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
The study included 206 Japanese preadolescent C-II patients treated with HG and/or FA, with serial lateral cephalograms taken at ages of 8 (T0) and 10 (T1). A single orthodontist with 7 years of experience identified 28 hard-tissue cephalometric landmarks. A Treatment Prediction Graph Convolutional Neural Network (TP-GCNN), integrating a high-resolution network and a graph neural network, was trained and validated using the landmarks' x- and y-coordinates. Data was split into training, validation and testing sets (ratio of 8:1:1; n = 164, n = 21 and n = 21). Model performance was assessed using the values of prediction error (PE, excellent, ≤ 0.5 mm; very good, 0.5-1.0 mm; good, 1.0-1.5 mm; acceptable, 1.5-2.0 mm; unsatisfactory, > 2.0 mm) and the degree of accurate prediction percentage (APP; very high, ≥ 90%; high, 70%-90%; medium, 50%-70%; low, < 50%).
RESULTS
The mean PE value was 1.45 mm. In terms of PE, all landmarks showed the accuracy above the 'acceptable' category. In terms of APP, 'High' APP was observed at Hinge axis, Pterygoid point, A-point, PNS, ANS, R1, R3 and Articulare. However, 'Low' APP was noted for Pm, Pogonion, B-point and Menton. The remaining landmarks demonstrated 'Medium' APP.
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrates the potential of AI to reliably predict the effects of HG and/or FA treatment in preadolescent patients with Class II malocclusion.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.