Pediatric surgery international · 2024
Management of pediatric lower extremity vascular trauma: adult vs pediatric level I trauma centers.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dantes Goeto, Grady Zachary J, Weeks Ahna, Forrester Nathaniel, Trinidad Jose B, Stokes Alexis, Dutreuil Valerie L, Cheng Annie, Kim Phillip, Smith Randi N, Ramos Christopher R, Todd Samual R, Smith Alexis, Sciarretta Jason D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pediatric lower extremity vascular injury (PLEVI) is uncommon and the availability of granular data is sparse. This study evaluated the surgical management of PLEVIs between a Level I adult (ATC) vs pediatric (PTC) trauma center.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of PLEVIs (< 18 years) managed surgically between 01/2009-12/2022. Demographics and outcome data were obtained. Primary outcomes included amputation and fasciotomy rates. Secondary outcomes included type of vessel repair, mortality, and hospital length of stay.
RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were identified, 41 at the ATC and 38 at the PTC, totaling 112 vessels injured. ATC patients were older (median years 16.0 vs 12.5) and almost exclusively (97.6% vs 29.0%) gunshot wounds. Vascular surgeons managed 50% of injuries at the ATC vs 73.7% at the PTC (p = 0.10). Amputations were uncommon and not significantly different between centers. Seventeen patients (44.7%) required fasciotomies at the PTC vs 21 (51.2%) at the ATC (p = 0.56). Rates of vessel repair, ligation, grafting, mortality, and hospital length of stay were not significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: PLEVI can be managed safely at ATCs and PTCs with acceptable outcomes. However, important nuances in patient triage and management need to be considered. Multi-institutional comprehensive datasets are needed.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of PLEVIs (< 18 years) managed surgically between 01/2009-12/2022. Demographics and outcome data were obtained. Primary outcomes included amputation and fasciotomy rates. Secondary outcomes included type of vessel repair, mortality, and hospital length of stay.
RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were identified, 41 at the ATC and 38 at the PTC, totaling 112 vessels injured. ATC patients were older (median years 16.0 vs 12.5) and almost exclusively (97.6% vs 29.0%) gunshot wounds. Vascular surgeons managed 50% of injuries at the ATC vs 73.7% at the PTC (p = 0.10). Amputations were uncommon and not significantly different between centers. Seventeen patients (44.7%) required fasciotomies at the PTC vs 21 (51.2%) at the ATC (p = 0.56). Rates of vessel repair, ligation, grafting, mortality, and hospital length of stay were not significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: PLEVI can be managed safely at ATCs and PTCs with acceptable outcomes. However, important nuances in patient triage and management need to be considered. Multi-institutional comprehensive datasets are needed.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.