MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.07.015

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2025

Does Frequency of the Mechanical Vibration Matter? Evaluating the Impact of Whole-Body Vibration Training on Older Adults Strength, Balance, and Gait Performance: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Xing Kailin, Duan Ran, Fang Zhu, Sun Xiangyang, Koo Dohoon, Panday Siddhartha Bikram

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To identify the optimal whole-body vibration training (WBVT) mechanical vibration frequency for enhancing muscle strength, static balance, dynamic balance, and gait performance among older adults through systematic review and network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to December 2024.

STUDY SELECTION: The RCTs comparing low-frequency WBVT (LF-WBVT, frequency of the mechanical vibration, f<20 Hz), medium-frequency WBVT (MF-WBVT, 20 Hz≤f<30 Hz), and high-frequency WBVT (HF-WBVT, 30 Hz≤f≤40 Hz), and traditional training regarding their effects on strength, balance, and gait in healthy older adults were included.

DATA EXTRACTION: Methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale, and evidence quality was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Continuous data were analyzed as mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using Stata MP 15.1 (StataCorp).

DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-seven RCTs (1608 participants) were included. Ranking probability analysis indicated MF-WBVT was most effective for static balance (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA]=98.5%; SMD=2.55; 95% CI, 0.85-4.24), HF-WBVT ranked highest for dynamic balance (SUCRA=75.8%; MD=0.60; 95% CI, 0.12-1.07) and gait performance (SUCRA=85.1%; MD=0.45; 95% CI, 0.15-0.75), and traditional training was optimal for improving muscle strength (SUCRA=80.1%; SMD=0.61; 95% CI, 0.27-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Among the 3 mechanical vibration frequency types examined, HF-WBVT is optimal for improving dynamic balance and gait performance, MF-WBVT is recommended for static balance, and traditional training is preferable for enhancing muscle strength.

Для цитирования: Xing Kailin, Duan Ran, Fang Zhu, Sun Xiangyang, Koo Dohoon, Panday Siddhartha Bikram. Does Frequency of the Mechanical Vibration Matter? Evaluating the Impact of Whole-Body Vibration Training on Older Adults Strength, Balance, and Gait Performance: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.07.015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.