European journal of radiology · 2020
Magnetic resonance imaging markers reflect cognitive outcome after rehabilitation in children with acquired brain injury.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ressel Volker, Berati Daphne, Raselli Carla, Birrer Karin, Kottke Raimund, van Hedel Hubertus Ja, Tuura Ruth O'Gorman
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To test markers from conventional and diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as possible predictors of cognitive outcome following rehabilitation therapy in children with acquired brain injury (ABI).
METHODS: Twenty-one children (10 boys, mean age 11.6 years, range 7.1-19.4) with stroke or traumatic brain injury underwent MRI including Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) before admission to the rehabilitation centre. The conventional images were scored according to a standardised injury scoring system, and mean Fractional Anisotropy (FA) was determined within the Corpus Callosum (CC), as this structure is hypothesised to play an important role in cognition. Both conventional MRI injury scores and mean FA of the CC and its sub-regions were compared with standard functional cognitive outcome scores. Relationships between MRI indices and cognitive outcome scores were assessed using multiple regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.
RESULTS: A backwards regression analysis revealed that the mean FA of the CC body and genu and the supratentorial injury score appear to represent the best predictors of outcome, together with the age at rehabilitation and time in rehabilitation. In the ROC analysis, the mean FA values of the CC body and genu and the infratentorial injury score provided the highest sensitivity, while the mean FA of the CC splenium showed the highest specificity for outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: The conventional MRI injury scores and DTI metrics from the CC reflect cognitive outcomes following rehabilitation. Neuroimaging methods such as MRI with DTI may therefore provide important markers for cognitive recovery after brain injury.
METHODS: Twenty-one children (10 boys, mean age 11.6 years, range 7.1-19.4) with stroke or traumatic brain injury underwent MRI including Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) before admission to the rehabilitation centre. The conventional images were scored according to a standardised injury scoring system, and mean Fractional Anisotropy (FA) was determined within the Corpus Callosum (CC), as this structure is hypothesised to play an important role in cognition. Both conventional MRI injury scores and mean FA of the CC and its sub-regions were compared with standard functional cognitive outcome scores. Relationships between MRI indices and cognitive outcome scores were assessed using multiple regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.
RESULTS: A backwards regression analysis revealed that the mean FA of the CC body and genu and the supratentorial injury score appear to represent the best predictors of outcome, together with the age at rehabilitation and time in rehabilitation. In the ROC analysis, the mean FA values of the CC body and genu and the infratentorial injury score provided the highest sensitivity, while the mean FA of the CC splenium showed the highest specificity for outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: The conventional MRI injury scores and DTI metrics from the CC reflect cognitive outcomes following rehabilitation. Neuroimaging methods such as MRI with DTI may therefore provide important markers for cognitive recovery after brain injury.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAge FactorsBrainBrain InjuriesBrain MappingChildCognitive DysfunctionDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePredictive Value of TestsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexSex FactorsSwitzerlandTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult