MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · European journal of dermatology : EJD · 2000

Comparative study between terbinafine 1% emulsion-gel versus ketoconazole 2% cream in tinea cruris and tinea corporis.

Bonifaz A, Saúl A

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

An open, prospective, comparative, randomised and parallel-group study of 65 patients was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical 1 % emulsion-gel of terbinafine versus 2% ketoconazole cream in the treatment of tinea corporis and tinea cruris. Treatment for terbinafine emulsion-gel was applied once daily for 1 week, whereas ketoconazole cream was applied once daily for 2 weeks; patients were followed for 2 weeks. Thirty-three patients in the terbinafine group and 32 in the ketoconazole group were evaluated for efficacy and safety. At the end of the study, rates of mycological cure were 94% for terbinafine emulsion-gel and 69% for ketoconazole cream (p = 0.027). A clinical and mycological overall evaluation was obtained for 72% of patients receiving terbinafine emulsion gel and 31% of patients receiving ketoconazole cream (p = 0.002). A total of four patients (1 in the terbinafine group and 3 in the ketoconazole group) had contact dermatitis-like side effects. We conclude that a 1-week course of terbinafine 1% emulsion-gel is significantly more effective than ketoconazole 2% cream in the treatment of tinea corporis and tinea cruris as regards clinical and mycological cure and treatment safety.

Для цитирования: Bonifaz A, Saúl A. Comparative study between terbinafine 1% emulsion-gel versus ketoconazole 2% cream in tinea cruris and tinea corporis.. European journal of dermatology : EJD. 2000.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.