m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of communication disorders · 1998

Feedback control of the auditory periphery: anti-masking effects of middle ear muscles vs. olivocochlear efferents.

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Liberman M C, Guinan J J

Аннотация

Both MEM and MOC systems are sound-evoked reflexes to the auditory periphery which can be elicited by sound in either ear. Both MEM and MOC systems can increase thresholds in the auditory periphery: the MEM system acts by stiffening the ossicular chain, the MOC system by decreasing outer hair cell amplification of sound-induced motion in the inner ear. MEM-induced attenuations are largest for low frequency stimuli, MOC-induced attenuations are largest for mid- to high-frequency sounds. Both MEM and MOC systems can have anti-masking effects. The MEM reflex can decrease the masking of high-frequency signals by low-frequency noise (i.e., the upward spread of masking). The MOC reflex is complementary in that it minimizes masking of high-frequency transient signals by high-frequency continuous noise. MEM anti-masking arises by reducing suppressive masking and can improve masked thresholds at high frequencies. MOC anti-masking arises by counteracting excitatory masking. It does not improve masked thresholds, but can improve the detectability of small suprathreshold intensity increments. Anti-masking effects of both MEM and MOC systems should be reduced in cases of sensorineural hearing loss.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты