MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.12.001

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the World federation of orthodontists · 2025

Integrating machine learning for treatment decisions in anterior open bite orthodontic cases: A retrospective study.

Rhee Matthew, Elnagar Mohammed H, Allareddy Veerasathpurush, Milani Omid Halimi, Cetin Ahmet Enis, Sanchez Flavio Jose

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

This article explores the integration of machine learning (ML) algorithms to aid in treatment planning and extraction decisions for anterior open bite cases, leveraging demographic, clinical, and radiographic data to predict treatment outcomes and informed decision-making.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted using patient data from the University of Illinois Chicago Department of Orthodontics. Data included demographic, clinical, and radiographic information from 115 anterior open bite patients who successfully completed their treatment. ML algorithms, including random forest, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, and convolutional neural networks (CNN), were trained on a subset of the data to predict treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed in the percentages of males and females between the extraction and nonextraction groups and cephalometric variables between the two groups, which include maxillary depth, maxillary height, SN-palatal plane, facial angle, facial axis-Ricketts, FMA, total facial height, lower facial height, SNA, SNB, and SN-MP e ML algorithms examined consisted of CNN2, CNN1, and Random Forest, which demonstrated the highest accuracy rates (∼83%), while k-Nearest Neighbor had the lowest (∼73%). Key features influencing accuracy included crowding, SN-palatal plane, SNA, FMA, molar relation, and facial height measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The study's evaluation of AI algorithms showed that CNN2, CNN1, and random forest had an accuracy of approximately 83% in classifying extraction versus nonextraction cases. Notably, features such as U-crowding, L-crowding, SN-palatal plane, SNA, FMA, molar relation, total facial height, lower facial height, and facial axis-Ricketts were most influential in achieving accuracy rates comparable to traditional methods.

Для цитирования: Rhee Matthew, Elnagar Mohammed H, Allareddy Veerasathpurush, Milani Omid Halimi, Cetin Ahmet Enis, Sanchez Flavio Jose. Integrating machine learning for treatment decisions in anterior open bite orthodontic cases: A retrospective study.. Journal of the World federation of orthodontists. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.12.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.