Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT · 2012
Action imagery combined with action observation activates more corticomotor regions than action observation alone.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nedelko Violetta, Hassa Thomas, Hamzei Farsin, Schoenfeld Mircea Ariel, Dettmers Christian
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Both action observation (AO) and action imagery have been proposed as therapeutic options for stroke rehabilitation. Currently, it is not clear to what extent their underlying neuronal mechanisms differ from each other and whether one of these therapeutic options might be preferable for this purpose.
METHODS: Twenty-six neurologically healthy subjects were investigated using functional magnetic resonance imaging during AO alone and during AO with additional action imagery of video clips showing simple, object-related hand actions.
RESULTS: The blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal induced by AO increased in a bihemispheric, symmetrical network of areas including the occipital, superior, and inferior parietal cortex, dorsal and ventral premotor regions, and the prefrontal cortex. The addition of imagery to the AO elicited additional activation in both cerebellar hemispheres, caudate nucleus, ventral and dorsal premotor cortex, inferior parietal cortex, and the supplementary motor area.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: These data reveal more profound activations of the motor system during AO in conjunction with imagery than during AO alone. These results may have important implications for neurorehabilitation and motor learning.
METHODS: Twenty-six neurologically healthy subjects were investigated using functional magnetic resonance imaging during AO alone and during AO with additional action imagery of video clips showing simple, object-related hand actions.
RESULTS: The blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal induced by AO increased in a bihemispheric, symmetrical network of areas including the occipital, superior, and inferior parietal cortex, dorsal and ventral premotor regions, and the prefrontal cortex. The addition of imagery to the AO elicited additional activation in both cerebellar hemispheres, caudate nucleus, ventral and dorsal premotor cortex, inferior parietal cortex, and the supplementary motor area.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: These data reveal more profound activations of the motor system during AO in conjunction with imagery than during AO alone. These results may have important implications for neurorehabilitation and motor learning.