American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2022
Three-dimensional cone-beam computed technology evaluation of skeletal and dental changes in growing patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the cervical pull face-bow headgear appliance.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bates William Ray, Cevidanes Lucia Soares, Larson Brent E, Adams David, De Oliveira Ruellas Antonio Carlos
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to 3-dimensionally quantify and compare the outcomes of growing patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the cervical pull face-bow headgear appliance in combination with full fixed orthodontic appliances.
METHODS: The study sample consisted of 22 patients with Class II malocclusion with the following inclusion criteria: ANB >4.75°, Class II molar relationship, and SN-GoGn <37°. The mean age of patients was 12.5 ± 1.1 years at baseline. The average treatment time was 27.7 ± 7.3 months. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were superimposed in the cranial base, maxillary regional, and mandibular regional to evaluate growth, treatment displacements, and bone remodeling.
RESULTS: Relevant statistically and clinically significant skeletal changes included average decreases in ANB (2.1 ± 1.1°) and SNA (1.8 ± 1.1°); posterior (1.3 ± 1.4 mm) and inferior (4.6 ± 2.2 mm) displacement of A-point; inferior displacements of B-point (5.4 ± 2.8 mm) and Pogonion (5.8 ± 2.6 mm); superior displacement of Condylion (6.9 ± 2.4 mm); increase in mandibular length (5.4 ± 2.0 mm); and clockwise rotation of palatal plane (1.9 ± 1.9°). Significant proclination of the maxillary incisors (9.8 ± 11.1°) and nonsignificant proclination of the mandibular incisors (4.7 ± 9.6°) were also noted.
CONCLUSIONS: Class II skeletal correction was primarily achieved by posterior, inferior displacement of the sagittal position of the maxilla. Change in the sagittal position of the mandible/chin (B-point, Pogonion) was not significant; rather, mandibular displacement was significant in an inferior vertical direction without backward rotation, as seen from marked condylar and ramus growth.
METHODS: The study sample consisted of 22 patients with Class II malocclusion with the following inclusion criteria: ANB >4.75°, Class II molar relationship, and SN-GoGn <37°. The mean age of patients was 12.5 ± 1.1 years at baseline. The average treatment time was 27.7 ± 7.3 months. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were superimposed in the cranial base, maxillary regional, and mandibular regional to evaluate growth, treatment displacements, and bone remodeling.
RESULTS: Relevant statistically and clinically significant skeletal changes included average decreases in ANB (2.1 ± 1.1°) and SNA (1.8 ± 1.1°); posterior (1.3 ± 1.4 mm) and inferior (4.6 ± 2.2 mm) displacement of A-point; inferior displacements of B-point (5.4 ± 2.8 mm) and Pogonion (5.8 ± 2.6 mm); superior displacement of Condylion (6.9 ± 2.4 mm); increase in mandibular length (5.4 ± 2.0 mm); and clockwise rotation of palatal plane (1.9 ± 1.9°). Significant proclination of the maxillary incisors (9.8 ± 11.1°) and nonsignificant proclination of the mandibular incisors (4.7 ± 9.6°) were also noted.
CONCLUSIONS: Class II skeletal correction was primarily achieved by posterior, inferior displacement of the sagittal position of the maxilla. Change in the sagittal position of the mandible/chin (B-point, Pogonion) was not significant; rather, mandibular displacement was significant in an inferior vertical direction without backward rotation, as seen from marked condylar and ramus growth.