DOI 10.1016/j.medcli.2019.03.037
Endobronchial ultrasound elastography for diagnosing mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
The main objective was to analyze the technical variability of EBUS-elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes. As a secondary objective, the results of the EBUS-elastography in said differentiation were analyzed, comparing them with the anatomopathological results.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
Prospective and analytical study of lymph nodes in which EBUS-elastography was performed. Elastographic variables and their variability were analyzed.
RESULTS
24 patients and 38 lymph nodes were evaluated. Of these, 60.5% had a history of neoplasia, 71% of them were EBUS-elastography with diagnostic intention, 53% were mediastinal staging of lung cancer. Both procedures were performed in 25% of the patients. Lymph nodes were classified into elastographic colour patterns, red being characteristic of elastic tissues and blue of rigid tissues. The lymphadenopathies with apredominantly blue pattern were associated with an anatomopathological result of malignancy (86% vs. 14%, OR 20.4 (3.1 -245.1) p-value = .00015). Malignant lymph nodes presented less colour dispersion in the frequency histograms and a higher ratio of blue pixels and higher strain ratio. These variables showed a variability of 8.7, 9.9 and 31.6% respectively in repetitions in the same adenopathy. Finally, a 66% of consistency was obtained in the event of colour pattern variability (p .0000).
CONCLUSIONS
EBUS-elastography is feasible during EBUS and may be helpful in predicting malignant lymph node infiltration. The quantitative elastographic data show low variability in repetitions in the same adenopathy. The strain ratio is the most variable elastographic parameter.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.