Clinical performance and robustness evaluation of plasma amyloid-β42/40 prescreening.

INTRODUCTION

Further evidence is needed to support the use of plasma amyloid β (Aβ) biomarkers as Alzheimer's disease prescreening tools. This study evaluated the clinical performance and robustness of plasma Aβ42 /Aβ40 for amyloid positivity prescreening.

METHODS

Data were collected from 333 BioFINDER and 121 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study participants. Risk and predictive values versus percentile of plasma Aβ42 /Aβ40 evaluated the actionability of plasma Aβ42 /Aβ40 , and simulations modeled the impact of potential uncertainties and biases. Amyloid PET was the brain amyloidosis reference standard.

RESULTS

Elecsys plasma Aβ42 /Aβ40 could potentially rule out amyloid pathology in populations with low-to-moderate amyloid positivity prevalence. However, simulations showed small measurement or pre-analytical errors in Aβ42 and/or Aβ40 cause misclassifications, impacting sensitivity or specificity. The minor fold change between amyloid PET positive and negative cases explains the biomarkers low robustness.

DISCUSSION: Implementing plasma Aβ42 /Aβ40 for routine clinical use may pose significant challenges, with misclassification risks.

HIGHLIGHTS: Plasma Aβ42 /Aβ40 ruled out amyloid PET positivity in a setting of low amyloid-positive prevalence. Including (pre-) analytical errors or measurement biases caused misclassifications. Plasma Aβ42 /Aβ40 had a low inherent dynamic range, independent of analytical method. Other blood biomarkers may be easier to implement as robust prescreening tools.