Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2025
Evaluation of MR-driven versus MR-free PET/CT spatial normalization approaches for quantification of regional uptake in Dementia.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Grassi Francesco, Verdicchio Mario, Cavaliere Carlo, Alfano Vincenzo, Cerrone Marco, Di Cecca Angelica, Salvatore Elena, Nicolai Emanuele, Salvatore Marco, Pappatà Sabina, Aiello Marco
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Spatial normalization is a critical preprocessing step in PET imaging. While MR-driven normalization represents the gold standard, MR-free approaches offer an alternative that may enhance accessibility.
PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the performance of MR-free normalization compared to MR-driven normalization across three PET modalities (18F-FDG, early-phase amyloid, and late amyloid PET), examinating regional agreement.
METHODS: 56 patients with dementia performing MR and the three PET modalities were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Three different spatial normalization methods were performed: MR-driven and two MR-free (15O-H2O template and site-specific PET template). The agreement among different methods was pair-wise compared using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
RESULTS: MR-free normalization showed strong agreement with MR-driven methods for FDG and early amyloid PET, with ICCs > 0.99 in cortical regions. The spatial normalization with early-phase amyloid site-specific template had a median ICC of 0.927, confirming its agreement with MR-driven approach. The performance was slightly lower with late amyloid-derived templates (ICC = 0.822) compared to the 15O-H2O template. The worst reproducibility was observed in cerebellar and thalamic sub-regions, though aggregating sub-ROIs in parent regions brought to strong ICCs (> 0.920).
CONCLUSION: MR-free normalization is a viable alternative to MR-driven approaches, particularly for FDG and early amyloid PET. In addition, the results confirm the similarity of early amyloid and FDG tracers distributions.
PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the performance of MR-free normalization compared to MR-driven normalization across three PET modalities (18F-FDG, early-phase amyloid, and late amyloid PET), examinating regional agreement.
METHODS: 56 patients with dementia performing MR and the three PET modalities were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Three different spatial normalization methods were performed: MR-driven and two MR-free (15O-H2O template and site-specific PET template). The agreement among different methods was pair-wise compared using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
RESULTS: MR-free normalization showed strong agreement with MR-driven methods for FDG and early amyloid PET, with ICCs > 0.99 in cortical regions. The spatial normalization with early-phase amyloid site-specific template had a median ICC of 0.927, confirming its agreement with MR-driven approach. The performance was slightly lower with late amyloid-derived templates (ICC = 0.822) compared to the 15O-H2O template. The worst reproducibility was observed in cerebellar and thalamic sub-regions, though aggregating sub-ROIs in parent regions brought to strong ICCs (> 0.920).
CONCLUSION: MR-free normalization is a viable alternative to MR-driven approaches, particularly for FDG and early amyloid PET. In addition, the results confirm the similarity of early amyloid and FDG tracers distributions.