Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology · 2016
The ultrasound meal accommodation test in 509 patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Steinsvik Elisabeth K, Hausken Trygve, Gilja Odd Helge
Аннотация
AIM: The Ultrasound Meal Accommodation Test (UMAT) is a clinical test used to assess gastric accommodation, gastric emptying, and visceral sensitivity. It has been used as a clinical tool at Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen for more than 20 years.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five-hundred and nine patients were retrospectively evaluated, 71% females, and 51% were referred from other hospitals or specialists. The aim was to explore the usefulness of UMAT in patients with suspected functional GI disorders (FGID).
RESULTS: One hundred and sixty patients were diagnosed with functional dyspepsia (FD), and 154 patients were diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The overlap between IBS and FD was 41%. In 36% of FD patients, ultrasound assessment showed impaired gastric accommodation. Of 262 patients filling out all required fields for the FD diagnosis (ROMA II and III), 198 (74%) met the criteria for FD, but only 91 (34%) were later diagnosed with FD by an experienced clinician.
CONCLUSIONS: By combining ultrasonography, the symptom response to a standardized meal, and psychological assessment, the UMAT is useful in diagnosis and management of patients with FGID.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five-hundred and nine patients were retrospectively evaluated, 71% females, and 51% were referred from other hospitals or specialists. The aim was to explore the usefulness of UMAT in patients with suspected functional GI disorders (FGID).
RESULTS: One hundred and sixty patients were diagnosed with functional dyspepsia (FD), and 154 patients were diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The overlap between IBS and FD was 41%. In 36% of FD patients, ultrasound assessment showed impaired gastric accommodation. Of 262 patients filling out all required fields for the FD diagnosis (ROMA II and III), 198 (74%) met the criteria for FD, but only 91 (34%) were later diagnosed with FD by an experienced clinician.
CONCLUSIONS: By combining ultrasonography, the symptom response to a standardized meal, and psychological assessment, the UMAT is useful in diagnosis and management of patients with FGID.