American journal of hypertension · 2018
Measurement of Central Aortic Blood Pressure in Youth: Role of Obesity and Sex.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Harbin Michelle M, Hultgren Neil E, Kelly Aaron S, Dengel Donald R, Evanoff Nicholas G, Ryder Justin R
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The relationship between pediatric severe obesity (SO) and central aortic blood pressure (BP) has yet to be established.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 348 youth (48.5% male, age 12.7 ± 0.1 years) with a wide range of body mass index (BMI) values: normal weight (NW; ≥5th and <85th BMI percentiles), overweight/obesity (OW/OB; 85th to <120% of the 95th BMI percentile), and SO (≥120% of the 95th BMI percentile). Measures of central aortic BP were obtained via applanation tonometry with SphygmoCor MM3 software.
RESULTS: After adjustment for covariates, no significant sex differences were observed for radial-aortic systolic blood pressure (SBP) (P = 0.39), carotid-aortic SBP (P = 0.99), radial-aortic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (P = 0.44), and carotid-aortic DBP (P = 0.53). Compared to youth with NW, youth with SO exhibited higher radial-aortic SBP (SO vs. NW: 102 ± 1 mm Hg vs. 90 ± 1 mm Hg, P<0.001), carotid-aortic SBP (SO vs. NW: 121 ± 1 mm Hg vs. 109 ± 1 mm Hg, P<0.001), and carotid-aortic DBP (SO vs. NW: 60 ± 1 mm Hg vs. 56 ± 1 mm Hg, P = 0.04). Compared to youth with OW/OB, youth with SO had higher radial-aortic SBP (OW/OB: 97 ± 1 mm Hg, P = 0.002) and carotid-aortic SBP (OW/OB: 114 ± 1 mm Hg, P = 0.007). After adjusting for either total-body percent fat mass or visceral adipose tissue, BMI was still a significant predictor of both radial-aortic and carotid-aortic SBP and DBP (P<0.001, all).
CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of youth with a wide range of adiposity levels, central aortic BP was elevated among individuals with SO and associated with BMI but not body fatness.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 348 youth (48.5% male, age 12.7 ± 0.1 years) with a wide range of body mass index (BMI) values: normal weight (NW; ≥5th and <85th BMI percentiles), overweight/obesity (OW/OB; 85th to <120% of the 95th BMI percentile), and SO (≥120% of the 95th BMI percentile). Measures of central aortic BP were obtained via applanation tonometry with SphygmoCor MM3 software.
RESULTS: After adjustment for covariates, no significant sex differences were observed for radial-aortic systolic blood pressure (SBP) (P = 0.39), carotid-aortic SBP (P = 0.99), radial-aortic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (P = 0.44), and carotid-aortic DBP (P = 0.53). Compared to youth with NW, youth with SO exhibited higher radial-aortic SBP (SO vs. NW: 102 ± 1 mm Hg vs. 90 ± 1 mm Hg, P<0.001), carotid-aortic SBP (SO vs. NW: 121 ± 1 mm Hg vs. 109 ± 1 mm Hg, P<0.001), and carotid-aortic DBP (SO vs. NW: 60 ± 1 mm Hg vs. 56 ± 1 mm Hg, P = 0.04). Compared to youth with OW/OB, youth with SO had higher radial-aortic SBP (OW/OB: 97 ± 1 mm Hg, P = 0.002) and carotid-aortic SBP (OW/OB: 114 ± 1 mm Hg, P = 0.007). After adjusting for either total-body percent fat mass or visceral adipose tissue, BMI was still a significant predictor of both radial-aortic and carotid-aortic SBP and DBP (P<0.001, all).
CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of youth with a wide range of adiposity levels, central aortic BP was elevated among individuals with SO and associated with BMI but not body fatness.