m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 1990

A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

McNamara J A, Howe R P, Dischinger T G

Аннотация

This study investigated the treatment effects produced by two types of functional appliance, one primarily tooth-borne (the Herbst appliance) and one primarily tissue-borne (the FR-2 of Fränkel). Serial cephalometric radiographs from 45 patients who had been treated with the acrylic splint Herbst appliance and from 41 patients who had been treated with the FR-2 appliance were compared with serial radiographs of 21 untreated persons with Class II malocclusions. Treatment effects were identified through the use of a conventional cephalometric analysis. The results of this study indicated that both appliances had influenced the growth of the craniofacial complex in treated persons. Significant skeletal changes were noted in both treatment groups, with both groups showing an increase in mandibular length and in lower facial height, as compared with controls. Greater dentoalveolar treatment effects were noted in the group wearing the tooth-borne functional appliance than in those wearing the tissue-borne appliance.

Предметные рубрики MeSH