Terapevticheskii arkhiv · 2007
[Immunological and pathogenetic aspects of imunofan administration in aged patients with duodenal ulcer].
Клиническое исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Оригинал на русском
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Butorov I V, Osoianu Iu P, Butorov S I, Maksimov V V
Аннотация
AIM: To specify immunological and pathogenetic aspects of imunophan use in aged patients with duodenal ulcer (DU).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Imunophan was given to 24 DU patients (mean age 62.0 +/- 1.5 years), in whom the size of ulcer varied from 0.6 to 2.1 cm.
RESULTS: The patients on anti-ulcer therapy plus imunophan had a pain relief median 6.2 +/- 0.2 days (p < 0.001), control ones--11.8 +/- 0.1 days. The median of scarring duration in the test group was 16.2 +/- 0.2 days (p < 0.001), in the controls--23.8 +/- 0.3 days. In 3 (30.0%) cases the scars were rough. The count of T-lymphocytes in the study group increased from 53.1 +/- 0.6 to 65.1 +/- 0.2% (p < 0.001), of T-helpers/inductors--from 27.8 +/- 0.2 to 38.5 +/- 0.3% (p < 0.001), of cytotoxic T-lymphocytes--from 18.5 +/- 0.5 to 27.3 +/- 0.3 (p < 0.001), of B-lymphocytes--from 12.3 +/- 0.2 to 19.1 +/- 0.1% (p < 0.001). The therapy including imunophan reduced concentration of malonic dialdehide by 23.5%, trienic conjugates by 61.6%; raised the level of superoxide dismutase 1.6-fold, catalase 1.4-fold, glutathione reductase by 41.9% (p < 0.001). Neither immune status nor LPO-AOD changed significantly in patients on the basic therapy alone.
CONCLUSION: The results obtained evidence for a positive action of imunophan on inflammation, immune status and antioxidant defense. Therefore, imunophan can be recommended as an adjuvant of basic anti-ulcer therapy in elderly and senile patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Imunophan was given to 24 DU patients (mean age 62.0 +/- 1.5 years), in whom the size of ulcer varied from 0.6 to 2.1 cm.
RESULTS: The patients on anti-ulcer therapy plus imunophan had a pain relief median 6.2 +/- 0.2 days (p < 0.001), control ones--11.8 +/- 0.1 days. The median of scarring duration in the test group was 16.2 +/- 0.2 days (p < 0.001), in the controls--23.8 +/- 0.3 days. In 3 (30.0%) cases the scars were rough. The count of T-lymphocytes in the study group increased from 53.1 +/- 0.6 to 65.1 +/- 0.2% (p < 0.001), of T-helpers/inductors--from 27.8 +/- 0.2 to 38.5 +/- 0.3% (p < 0.001), of cytotoxic T-lymphocytes--from 18.5 +/- 0.5 to 27.3 +/- 0.3 (p < 0.001), of B-lymphocytes--from 12.3 +/- 0.2 to 19.1 +/- 0.1% (p < 0.001). The therapy including imunophan reduced concentration of malonic dialdehide by 23.5%, trienic conjugates by 61.6%; raised the level of superoxide dismutase 1.6-fold, catalase 1.4-fold, glutathione reductase by 41.9% (p < 0.001). Neither immune status nor LPO-AOD changed significantly in patients on the basic therapy alone.
CONCLUSION: The results obtained evidence for a positive action of imunophan on inflammation, immune status and antioxidant defense. Therefore, imunophan can be recommended as an adjuvant of basic anti-ulcer therapy in elderly and senile patients.