Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025
Innovations in Dementia Empowerment and Action: RCT for Underserved Communities.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fredriksen-Goldsen Karen I, Teri Linda, Kim Hyun-Jun, Jones-Cobb Brittany, LaFazia David, McKenzie Glenise, Petros Ryan, Jung Hailey, Oswald Austin G, Hoy-Ellis Charles, Emlet Charles
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Research has revealed dementia disparities among underserved older adults. Built upon standard-Reducing Disability in Alzheimer's Disease (s-RDAD), Innovations in Dementia Empowerment and Action (IDEA) is designed and culturally tailored for underserved communities through an empowerment stigma-reduction cognitive-behavioral intervention and tested with sexual and gender minority (SGM) adults and care partners.
METHODS: The study is a 2-arm (IDEA and s-RDAD), single-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a staggered multiple baseline design. With 161 dyads (person living with dementia/care partner), the aim of the study is to compare the two arms via between and within group differences on primary (physical activity) and secondary outcomes (e.g., quality of life, physical functioning, and resource literacy) at post-treatment, and 30 and 56 week follow-up.
RESULTS: When comparing the two arm between-group differences, the IDEA care partners' community resource literacy was significantly higher at 30-week follow-up than for s-RDAD (contrast = 0.10, p = 0.005). While both intervention arms demonstrated efficacy with significant improvement in physical activity (contrastIDEA = 0.10, p = 0.010; contrasts-RDAD = 0.14, p < 0.001) and quality of life (contrastIDEA = 0.06, p < 0.001; contrasts-RDAD = 0.03, p = 0.035) for the person with dementia at post-treatment, positive treatment effects on physical activity (contrastIDEA = 0.09, p = 0.032) and quality of life (contrastIDEA = 0.03, p = 0.040) persisted at 30 weeks for IDEA but not for s-RDAD.
CONCLUSION: While both intervention arms were efficacious, IDEA demonstrated sustained efficacy. The cultural tailoring of interventions is promising to address disparities in dementia care and interventions in underserved communities. Future research is needed for the translation of this efficacious intervention to the larger community.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT03550131.
METHODS: The study is a 2-arm (IDEA and s-RDAD), single-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a staggered multiple baseline design. With 161 dyads (person living with dementia/care partner), the aim of the study is to compare the two arms via between and within group differences on primary (physical activity) and secondary outcomes (e.g., quality of life, physical functioning, and resource literacy) at post-treatment, and 30 and 56 week follow-up.
RESULTS: When comparing the two arm between-group differences, the IDEA care partners' community resource literacy was significantly higher at 30-week follow-up than for s-RDAD (contrast = 0.10, p = 0.005). While both intervention arms demonstrated efficacy with significant improvement in physical activity (contrastIDEA = 0.10, p = 0.010; contrasts-RDAD = 0.14, p < 0.001) and quality of life (contrastIDEA = 0.06, p < 0.001; contrasts-RDAD = 0.03, p = 0.035) for the person with dementia at post-treatment, positive treatment effects on physical activity (contrastIDEA = 0.09, p = 0.032) and quality of life (contrastIDEA = 0.03, p = 0.040) persisted at 30 weeks for IDEA but not for s-RDAD.
CONCLUSION: While both intervention arms were efficacious, IDEA demonstrated sustained efficacy. The cultural tailoring of interventions is promising to address disparities in dementia care and interventions in underserved communities. Future research is needed for the translation of this efficacious intervention to the larger community.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT03550131.