DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2026.112825
Post-operative results after tympanoplasty with cartilage palisades in underlay technique in children.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate anatomical and functional outcomes of type I tympanoplasty using 2-mm wide cartilage palisade grafts (CP) in children and to compare these outcomes with temporalis fascia (TF) and cartilage-perichondrium island grafts (CI).
METHODS
A retrospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary care center, including children aged 2-17 years who underwent type I tympanoplasty between January 2010 and December 2019. Outcomes were analyzed according to graft materials. Primary endpoints were rates of recurrent or residual tympanic membrane perforation and postoperative retraction. Secondary outcomes included changes in air-conduction thresholds (AC) and air-bone gap (ABG). Logistic regression was used to assess the influence of graft type and underlying pathology.
RESULTS
A total of 130 children (mean age 9.6 ± 3.8 years) were included (CP = 50, TF = 45, CI = 35). The CP group showed the lowest rates of postoperative perforation (16%) and retraction (4%) compared with TF (24.4%, 6.6%) and CI (20%, 5.7%) groups. Mean AC improvement was greatest in the CP group (8.9 dB; p < 0.001), followed by the CI group (5.4 dB; p < 0.001); improvement in the TF group was not significant. Reduction in ABG was greatest in the CP group (3.6 dB). Adhesive otitis media and cholesteatoma were significant predictors of postoperative perforation and retraction, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Type I tympanoplasty using 2-mm cartilage palisade grafts in children provides excellent graft stability and significant hearing improvement, even in high-risk middle ear conditions, supporting its use as a reliable pediatric reconstructive technique.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.