MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11845-013-0959-1

Медицинская библиотека · Irish journal of medical science · 2013

A retrospective audit of 200 cases of CNS tumours and their surgical management in a tertiary care centre.

Muhamat Nor F E, Chandrasekaran K, Marks J C

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIMS: To study the nature of the tumours managed in the Irish population.

METHODS

This audit research was completed via a retrospective medical review on 200 patients with CNS tumours managed in a tertiary care centre between 2008 and 2009.

RESULTS

The mean age was 53 years. The male:female ratio was 2:1. The majority were glioblastomas and astrocytomas. Grade IV tumours were predominant (65.5 %). Headaches (37 %), motor weakness (32 %) and seizures (25.5 %) were the highest presentations. The commonest sites affected were the left parietal and left temporal lobes. There were 17.5 % operative morbidities with motor weakness (22.9 %), seizure (14.3 %) and thrombo-embolism (14.3 %) dominating and significant association to surgical radicality (p = 0.041). 3.5 % operative mortalities were reported. 52.5 and 62.5 % of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CNS tumours typically had multiple presentations. More extensive surgical resection was associated with higher postoperative morbidities (p = 0.041). The 30-day postoperative morbidity (17.5 %) and mortality (3.5 %) were concordant with the currently available literature.

Для цитирования: Muhamat Nor F E, Chandrasekaran K, Marks J C. A retrospective audit of 200 cases of CNS tumours and their surgical management in a tertiary care centre.. Irish journal of medical science. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s11845-013-0959-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.