American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2023
Treatment change comparisons between skeletal Class I and II white adolescents with 3 different vertical divergencies-Part 2: Holdaway difference.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kang He-Kyong, Pangrazio-Kulbersh Valmy, Kaczynski Richard, Munoz AnaMaria
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The Holdaway difference represents the relationship of the NB line to the mandibular incisor (NB-L1) and the bony pogonion (NB-Pog). This study aimed to evaluate treatment changes of NB-L1, NB-Pog, and the Holdaway difference in patients with skeletal Class I and II relationships with 3 different skeletal divergencies.
METHODS: This retrospective study was the second part of treatment outcome assessments of 135 white adolescent patients (females, n = 69; males, n = 66; mean age, 12.8 ± 1.4 years pretreatment and 15.0 ± 1.4 years posttreatment). The NB-L1, NB-Pog, and Holdaway differences (NB-L1 - NB-Pog) were measured. The mixed-model analysis of variance was used to assess within- and between-subject effects responding to horizontal and vertical skeletal discrepancies.
RESULTS: For the group with favorable profile changes, the means of the Holdaway difference were maintained in the hypodivergent and normodivergent subgroups and reduced in the hyperdivergent subgroups for patients with skeletal Class I and II relationships. The means of NB-L1 and Holdaway difference were significantly larger in the skeletal Class II group and became greater as skeletal vertical divergencies increased. The NB-Pog means were significantly different only between the hypodivergent and hyperdivergent subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this study, the Holdaway difference should be adjusted to individualize the incisor positions, considering not only the anteroposterior but also the vertical skeletal relationships of the patients.
METHODS: This retrospective study was the second part of treatment outcome assessments of 135 white adolescent patients (females, n = 69; males, n = 66; mean age, 12.8 ± 1.4 years pretreatment and 15.0 ± 1.4 years posttreatment). The NB-L1, NB-Pog, and Holdaway differences (NB-L1 - NB-Pog) were measured. The mixed-model analysis of variance was used to assess within- and between-subject effects responding to horizontal and vertical skeletal discrepancies.
RESULTS: For the group with favorable profile changes, the means of the Holdaway difference were maintained in the hypodivergent and normodivergent subgroups and reduced in the hyperdivergent subgroups for patients with skeletal Class I and II relationships. The means of NB-L1 and Holdaway difference were significantly larger in the skeletal Class II group and became greater as skeletal vertical divergencies increased. The NB-Pog means were significantly different only between the hypodivergent and hyperdivergent subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this study, the Holdaway difference should be adjusted to individualize the incisor positions, considering not only the anteroposterior but also the vertical skeletal relationships of the patients.