The Angle orthodontist · 2013
Cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of palatal displaced canine position: a methodological study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Naoumova Julia, Kjellberg Heidrun, Palm Reet
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the inter- and intraexaminer reliability of a measurement method for evaluation of eruption angles and position of palatal displaced canines (PDCs) with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and to test the validity of the measured angles on a dry skull.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients (eight boys, 12 girls; age 11.4±1.2 years) were randomly chosen among 67 patients from a study evaluating the interceptive effect of extracting the deciduous canine in children with PDCs. In total, 60 images were analyzed, because each patient had three CBCT examinations (baseline, 6-month control, and endpoint). Two observers assessed the following measurements twice: mesioangular and sagittal angle, vertical position, canine cusp tip, and canine apex to dental arch. The validity of the angular measurements was tested against angular measurements on a dry skull using mathematical formulations.
RESULTS: The inter- and intraexaminer mean differences for angular and linear measurements were all low and statistically insignificant (P>.05). The mean differences between the physical and 3D measurements were 0.5±0.39 mm for the sagittal angle and 0.22±0.19 mm for the mesioangular angle.
CONCLUSIONS: Linear and angular measurements on CBCT images are accurate and precise and can be used to assess the precise position of a PDC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients (eight boys, 12 girls; age 11.4±1.2 years) were randomly chosen among 67 patients from a study evaluating the interceptive effect of extracting the deciduous canine in children with PDCs. In total, 60 images were analyzed, because each patient had three CBCT examinations (baseline, 6-month control, and endpoint). Two observers assessed the following measurements twice: mesioangular and sagittal angle, vertical position, canine cusp tip, and canine apex to dental arch. The validity of the angular measurements was tested against angular measurements on a dry skull using mathematical formulations.
RESULTS: The inter- and intraexaminer mean differences for angular and linear measurements were all low and statistically insignificant (P>.05). The mean differences between the physical and 3D measurements were 0.5±0.39 mm for the sagittal angle and 0.22±0.19 mm for the mesioangular angle.
CONCLUSIONS: Linear and angular measurements on CBCT images are accurate and precise and can be used to assess the precise position of a PDC.