MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1200/jco-25-02477

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025

Pirtobrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Treatment-Naïve and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma.

Woyach Jennifer A, Qiu Lugui, Grosicki Sebastian, Wrobel Tomasz, Capra Marcelo, Czyz Jaroslaw, Yi Shuhua, Eom Ki-Seong, Panovská Anna, Jurczak Wojciech, Laribi Kamel, Jacobasch Lutz, Baker Ross, Agajanian Richy, Berkovits Alejandro, Özcan Muhit, Lepretre Stéphane, Coombs Catherine C, Cramer Paula, Lewis Katharine L, Hill Marisa, Bao Katherine, Bian Yuanyuan, De Batista Ribeiro Silvia Ramalho, Bhandari Naleen Raj, Ruppert Amy S, Leow Ching Ching, Wierda William G

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеКлиническое исследование III фазыПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, noncovalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), has shown efficacy and safety in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) who received prior covalent BTKi. We report results, to our knowledge, from the first randomized head-to-head comparison of pirtobrutinib versus ibrutinib in BTKi-naïve CLL/SLL in both treatment-naïve (TN) patients and patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Patients (N = 662) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pirtobrutinib or ibrutinib. All patients were BTKi-naïve. Primary end points were overall response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC) among all randomly assigned patients (intention to treat [ITT]) and in patients with R/R disease.

RESULTS

The study met its primary end points, demonstrating statistically significant noninferiority (NI) of IRC-ORR for pirtobrutinib versus ibrutinib in both the ITT (87.0% [95% CI, 82.9 to 90.4] v 78.5% [95% CI, 73.7 to 82.9]; ORR ratio = 1.11 [95% CI, 1.03 to 1.19]; two-sided P < .0001) and R/R populations (n = 437; 84.0% [95% CI, 78.5 to 88.6] v 74.8% [95% CI, 68.5 to 80.4]; ORR ratio = 1.12 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.24]; two-sided P < .0001). In TN patients (n = 225), IRC-ORR was 92.9% (95% CI, 86.4 to 96.9) with pirtobrutinib versus 85.8% (95% CI, 78.0 to 91.7) with ibrutinib. Investigator assessed ORR results were consistent. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) favored pirtobrutinib in the ITT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.83]), R/R (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.47 to 1.13]), and TN (HR, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.59]) populations. Cardiac adverse event rates of atrial fibrillation/flutter and hypertension were lower with pirtobrutinib.

CONCLUSION

Pirtobrutinib demonstrated NI of ORR versus ibrutinib, with a favorable early PFS trend, particularly in TN patients, and a favorable safety profile including low rates of atrial fibrillation and hypertension.

Для цитирования: Woyach Jennifer A, Qiu Lugui, Grosicki Sebastian, Wrobel Tomasz, Capra Marcelo, Czyz Jaroslaw, Yi Shuhua, Eom Ki-Seong, Panovská Anna, Jurczak Wojciech, Laribi Kamel, Jacobasch Lutz, Baker Ross, Agajanian Richy, Berkovits Alejandro, Özcan Muhit, Lepretre Stéphane, Coombs Catherine C, Cramer Paula, Lewis Katharine L, Hill Marisa, Bao Katherine, Bian Yuanyuan, De Batista Ribeiro Silvia Ramalho, Bhandari Naleen Raj, Ruppert Amy S, Leow Ching Ching, Wierda William G. Pirtobrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Treatment-Naïve and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma.. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2025. DOI: 10.1200/jco-25-02477.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.