MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1538574410396588

Медицинская библиотека · Vascular and endovascular surgery · 2011

The results of high-frequency duplex surveillance after iliac arterial stenting in a single center.

Al Samaraee Ahmad, McCallum Iain, Cairns Tom, Barakat Tarig, Carew Melvin, Nice Colin, Mudawi Ahmed, Ashour Hamdy

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Frequent duplex surveillance after iliac arterial stenting is time-consuming and costly, so solid benefits of this approach must be available. Frequent duplex surveillance was performed at our center, this was reviewed retrospectively.A total of 117 stents were assessed. Duplex was done for 84 (71.8%) of 117 patients at 1 year and 25 (21.4%) of 117 at 5 years, mean follow-up 27.6 months. Totally, 456 scans were performed; 386 (84.6%) scans were normal, 43 (9.4%) showed an abnormality for which intervention was not necessary, 27 (5.9%) showed abnormalities which needed interventions. The maximum attendance of patients was 62%. In all, 18 patients had interventions unrelated to scheduled follow-up; 15 (83.3%) of 18 had no prior abnormalities on duplex, 3 (16.6%) of 18 had prior abnormalities which were not acted upon after clinical assessment. Our findings demonstrate a high nonattendance rate with frequent emergency presentations due to acute complications. We cannot, therefore, recommend frequent duplex surveillance program both in terms of results or resource allocation.

Для цитирования: Al Samaraee Ahmad, McCallum Iain, Cairns Tom, Barakat Tarig, Carew Melvin, Nice Colin, Mudawi Ahmed, Ashour Hamdy. The results of high-frequency duplex surveillance after iliac arterial stenting in a single center.. Vascular and endovascular surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1177/1538574410396588.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.