MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa0802944

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2008

Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Kastrati Adnan, Neumann Franz-Josef, Mehilli Julinda, Byrne Robert A, Iijima Raisuke, Büttner Heinz Joachim, Khattab Ahmed A, Schulz Stefanie, Blankenship James C, Pache Jürgen, Minners Jan, Seyfarth Melchior, Graf Isolde, Skelding Kimberly A, Dirschinger Josef, Richardt Gert, Berger Peter B, Schömig Albert, ISAR-REACT 3 Trial Investigators

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Whether bivalirudin is superior to unfractionated heparin in patients with stable or unstable angina who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after pretreatment with clopidogrel is unknown.

METHODS

We enrolled 4570 patients with stable or unstable angina (with normal levels of troponin T and creatine kinase MB) who were undergoing PCI after pretreatment with a 600-mg dose of clopidogrel at least 2 hours before the procedure; 2289 patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive bivalirudin, and 2281 to receive unfractionated heparin. The primary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, urgent target-vessel revascularization due to myocardial ischemia within 30 days after randomization, or major bleeding during the index hospitalization (with a net clinical benefit defined as a reduction in the incidence of the end point). The secondary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target-vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

The incidence of the primary end point was 8.3% (190 patients) in the bivalirudin group as compared with 8.7% (199 patients) in the unfractionated-heparin group (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.15; P=0.57). The secondary end point occurred in 134 patients (5.9%) in the bivalirudin group and 115 patients (5.0%) in the unfractionated-heparin group (relative risk, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.49; P=0.23). The incidence of major bleeding was 3.1% (70 patients) in the bivalirudin group and 4.6% (104 patients) in the unfractionated-heparin group (relative risk, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.90; P=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stable and unstable angina who underwent PCI after pretreatment with clopidogrel, bivalirudin did not provide a net clinical benefit (i.e., it did not reduce the incidence of the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, urgent target-vessel revascularization, or major bleeding) as compared with unfractionated heparin, but it did significantly reduce the incidence of major bleeding. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00262054.)

Для цитирования: Kastrati Adnan, Neumann Franz-Josef, Mehilli Julinda, Byrne Robert A, Iijima Raisuke, Büttner Heinz Joachim, Khattab Ahmed A, Schulz Stefanie, Blankenship James C, Pache Jürgen, Minners Jan, Seyfarth Melchior, Graf Isolde, Skelding Kimberly A, Dirschinger Josef, Richardt Gert, Berger Peter B, Schömig Albert, ISAR-REACT 3 Trial Investigators. Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention.. The New England journal of medicine. 2008. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa0802944.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.