Measures of infection prevention and incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Matuschek Christiane, Fischer Johannes C, Combs Stephanie E, Fietkau Rainer, Corradini Stefanie, Zänker Kurt, Bölke Edwin, Djiepmo-Njanang Freddy-Joel, Tamaskovics Balint, Fischer Joachim E, Stuschke Martin, Pöttgen Christoph, Förster Robert, Zwahlen Daniel R, Papachristofilou Alexandros, Ganswindt Ute, Pelka Rainer, Schneider E Marion, Feldt Torsten, Jensen Björn Erik Ole, Häussinger Dieter, Knoefel Wolfram Trudo, Kindgen-Milles Detlef, Pedoto Alessia, Grebe Olaf, van Griensven Martijn, Budach Wilfried, Haussmann Jan
Аннотация
METHODS: We addressed the incidence of positive COVID-19 cases in both patients and health care workers (HCW), in addition to the protective measures adopted in ROIs in Germany, Austria and Switzerland using a specific questionnaire.
RESULTS: The results of the questionnaire showed that a noteworthy number of ROIs were able to complete treatment in SARS-CoV‑2 positive cancer patients, with only a short interruption. The ROIs reported a significant decrease in patient volume that was not impacted by the circumambient disease incidence, the type of ROI or the occurrence of positive cases. Of the ROIs 16.5% also reported infected HCWs. About half of the ROIs (50.5%) adopted a screening program for patients whereas only 23.3% also screened their HCWs. The range of protective measures included the creation of working groups, instituting home office work and protection with face masks. Regarding the therapeutic options offered, curative procedures were performed with either unchanged or moderately decreased schedules, whereas palliative or benign radiotherapy procedures were more often shortened. Most ROIs postponed or cancelled radiation treatment for benign indications (88.1%). The occurrence of SARS-CoV‑2 infections did not affect the treatment options for curative procedures. Non-university-based ROIs seemed to be more willing to change their treatment options for curative and palliative cases than university-based ROIs.
CONCLUSION: Most ROIs reported a deep impact of SARS-CoV‑2 infections on their work routine. Modification and prioritization of treatment regimens and the application of protective measures preserved a well-functioning radiation oncology service and patient care.