Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024
Color-map recommendation for MR relaxometry maps.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fuderer Miha, Wichtmann Barbara, Crameri Fabio, de Souza Nandita M, Baeßler Bettina, Gulani Vikas, Wang Meiyun, Poot Dirk, de Boer Ruud, Cashmore Matt, Keenan Kathryn E, Ma Dan, Pirkl Carolin, Sollmann Nico, Weingärtner Sebastian, Mandija Stefano, Golay Xavier
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To harmonize the use of color for MR relaxometry maps and therefore recommend the use of specific color-maps for representing T 1 $$ {\mathrm{T}}_1 $$ , T 2 $$ {\mathrm{T}}_2 $$ , and T 2 * $$ {\mathrm{T}}_2^{\ast } $$ maps and their inverses.
METHODS: Perceptually linearized color-maps were chosen to have similar color settings as those proposed by Griswold et al. in 2018. A Delphi process, polling the opinion of a panel of 81 experts, was used to generate consensus on the suitability of these maps.
RESULTS: Consensus was reached on the suitability of the logarithm-processed Lipari color-map for T 1 $$ {\mathrm{T}}_1 $$ and the logarithm-processed Navia color-map for T 2 $$ {\mathrm{T}}_2 $$ and T 2 * $$ {\mathrm{T}}_2^{\ast } $$ . There was consensus on color bars being mandatory and on the use of a specific value indicating "invalidity." There was no consensus on whether the ranges should be fixed per anatomy.
CONCLUSION: The authors recommend the use of the logarithm-processed Lipari color-map for displaying quantitative T 1 $$ {\mathrm{T}}_1 $$ maps and R 1 $$ {\mathrm{R}}_1 $$ maps; likewise, the authors recommend the logarithm-processed Navia color-map for displaying T 2 $$ {\mathrm{T}}_2 $$ , T 2 * $$ {\mathrm{T}}_2^{\ast } $$ , R 2 $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2 $$ , and R 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ maps. This work originated with the Quantitative MR Study Group of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM); it has the approval of the Publication Committee and of the Board of the ISMRM.
METHODS: Perceptually linearized color-maps were chosen to have similar color settings as those proposed by Griswold et al. in 2018. A Delphi process, polling the opinion of a panel of 81 experts, was used to generate consensus on the suitability of these maps.
RESULTS: Consensus was reached on the suitability of the logarithm-processed Lipari color-map for T 1 $$ {\mathrm{T}}_1 $$ and the logarithm-processed Navia color-map for T 2 $$ {\mathrm{T}}_2 $$ and T 2 * $$ {\mathrm{T}}_2^{\ast } $$ . There was consensus on color bars being mandatory and on the use of a specific value indicating "invalidity." There was no consensus on whether the ranges should be fixed per anatomy.
CONCLUSION: The authors recommend the use of the logarithm-processed Lipari color-map for displaying quantitative T 1 $$ {\mathrm{T}}_1 $$ maps and R 1 $$ {\mathrm{R}}_1 $$ maps; likewise, the authors recommend the logarithm-processed Navia color-map for displaying T 2 $$ {\mathrm{T}}_2 $$ , T 2 * $$ {\mathrm{T}}_2^{\ast } $$ , R 2 $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2 $$ , and R 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ maps. This work originated with the Quantitative MR Study Group of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM); it has the approval of the Publication Committee and of the Board of the ISMRM.