MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.7.400

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of wound care · 2017

Survival rate and pressure ulcer prevalence in patients with and without dementia: a retrospective study.

Jaul E, Rosenzweig J P, Meiron O

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the prevalence of pressure ulcers (PUs) in older patients with advanced dementia versus older patients without dementia but with other comorbidities, such as diabetes, ischaemic heart disease and chronic renal failure. PUs were thought to be more prevalent and to present a higher risk of mortality in patients with dementia.

METHOD: PUs were assessed on admission using the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP) staging system. Patients were classified as either with or without dementia according to Reisberg's functional assessment staging test (FAST). The prevalence of PUs and the survival rates were analysed and compared in both groups. The combined effect of PUs and dementia on survival was assessed using the Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

The median survival rate of patients with PUs and dementia was 63 days, significantly lower than in patients with PUs without dementia 117 days. Both groups had similar other comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

These findings underscore the requirement for geriatricians and health professionals to be more vigilant in examining PUs as dementia progresses.

Для цитирования: Jaul E, Rosenzweig J P, Meiron O. Survival rate and pressure ulcer prevalence in patients with and without dementia: a retrospective study.. Journal of wound care. 2017. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.7.400.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.