European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2025
Molecular analysis of adolescent and young adult high grade gliomas in the SPECTA-AYA study: Poorly characterised tumours with frequent germline alterations.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Morfouace Marie, Bielle Franck, Razis Evangelia, Estrade Florian, Rubio Alba, Bautista Francisco, de Rojas Teresa, Vieito Maria, Meade Sara, Sanson Marc, Marques Andreia Capela, Preusser Matthias, Hatcher Helen, Balasubramanian Gnana Prakash, Pineda Estela, D'Hondt Lionel, Duerinck Johnny, Michotte Alex, Mawrin Christian, Ribalta Teresa, Marucci Gianluca, Golfinopoulos Vassilis, Pfister Stefan M, Jones David Tw, McCabe Martin G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) high grade gliomas (HGG) have the worst survival of AYA malignancies yet are poorly represented in large-scale molecular datasets.
METHODS: 50 AYAs aged 12-29 with newly diagnosed or recurrent HGG and other high risk central nervous system (CNS) tumours were prospectively recruited to the EORTC SPECTA platform study and underwent whole exome sequencing, RNA sequencing and methylation profiling, with central pathological review. Actionable mutations were reported and patients followed up for therapies and outcome.
RESULTS: From 46 locally diagnosed HGGs and 4 other recurrent CNS tumours, molecular and pathology review resulted in histological grade re-classification (n = 10), diagnostic refinement (n = 9) and revised diagnoses (n = 12) in a substantial proportion. Pathogenic constitutional alterations were present in 14 % overall and were largely limited to cases with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma and paediatric-type diffuse HGGs. 91 % of HGGs had potentially actionable alterations affecting RAS/RAF/MAPK (60 %), PI3K/AKT/mTOR (27 %) and cell cycle genes (11 %). High tumour mutational burden (> 10 somatic non-synonymous mutations per Mb of genome targeted) was present in 12 % at diagnosis and 18 % at recurrence, all in histological grade 4 tumours. Ten patients' treatment was modified on the basis of molecular profile, of whom 5 remained on treatment at last follow-up.
CONCLUSION: AYA HGGs comprise a diverse group of entities; accurate, molecularly-defined diagnosis is critical to direct primary treatment, determine risk of genetic predisposition and guide molecularly-directed therapy. Current services fail to routinely address diagnosis, personalised molecular profiling or investigation of therapeutic opportunities for this high risk, poor prognosis group of rare cancer patients.
METHODS: 50 AYAs aged 12-29 with newly diagnosed or recurrent HGG and other high risk central nervous system (CNS) tumours were prospectively recruited to the EORTC SPECTA platform study and underwent whole exome sequencing, RNA sequencing and methylation profiling, with central pathological review. Actionable mutations were reported and patients followed up for therapies and outcome.
RESULTS: From 46 locally diagnosed HGGs and 4 other recurrent CNS tumours, molecular and pathology review resulted in histological grade re-classification (n = 10), diagnostic refinement (n = 9) and revised diagnoses (n = 12) in a substantial proportion. Pathogenic constitutional alterations were present in 14 % overall and were largely limited to cases with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma and paediatric-type diffuse HGGs. 91 % of HGGs had potentially actionable alterations affecting RAS/RAF/MAPK (60 %), PI3K/AKT/mTOR (27 %) and cell cycle genes (11 %). High tumour mutational burden (> 10 somatic non-synonymous mutations per Mb of genome targeted) was present in 12 % at diagnosis and 18 % at recurrence, all in histological grade 4 tumours. Ten patients' treatment was modified on the basis of molecular profile, of whom 5 remained on treatment at last follow-up.
CONCLUSION: AYA HGGs comprise a diverse group of entities; accurate, molecularly-defined diagnosis is critical to direct primary treatment, determine risk of genetic predisposition and guide molecularly-directed therapy. Current services fail to routinely address diagnosis, personalised molecular profiling or investigation of therapeutic opportunities for this high risk, poor prognosis group of rare cancer patients.