MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12903-026-09469-y

Медицинская библиотека · BMC oral health · 2026

Longitudinal comparison of peri-implant clinical and radiographic parameters between e-cigarette users and conventional cigarette smokers.

Li Conghui, Tan Yi, Han Lu

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Conventional cigarette smoking is associated with peri-implant disease, but longitudinal evidence for electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) exposure is limited. We compared 12-month peri-implant clinical and radiographic trajectories between e-cigarette users and conventional cigarette smokers and assessed unequal current exposure duration.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included 328 patients with 452 implants (e-cigarette [EC] group, 152 patients/206 implants; conventional cigarette [CS] group, 176/246). Modified plaque index (mPLI), probing depth (PD), modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI), bleeding on probing (BOP), mucosal recession (MR), keratinized mucosa width (KMW), and marginal bone level (MBL) were recorded at loading, 6 months, and 12 months while implants remained in situ. Patient-clustered generalized estimating equations (GEE) assessed group, time, and group-by-time effects. PD and change in MBL (ΔMBL) were prioritized. A post hoc sensitivity model additionally adjusted for current exposure duration; product-specific intensity variables were examined within groups.

RESULTS

Continuous outcomes were available for 452, 448, and 440 implants at loading, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively; all 12 removals were entered into failure analyses. Current exposure duration was shorter among e-cigarette users (median, 3.0 vs. 12.0 years). At 12 months, mean PD was 3.18 versus 3.72 mm, and mean ΔMBL was 0.68 versus 1.01 mm. After duration adjustment, conventional cigarette exposure remained associated with greater PD (difference, 0.42 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.59; interaction P = 0.003) and ΔMBL (0.26 mm; 95% CI, 0.15-0.37; interaction P = 0.015). The crude mucositis association attenuated after parsimonious adjustment (odds ratio [OR], 1.72; 95% CI, 1.02-2.90; P = 0.043; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.64; 95% CI, 0.98-2.75; P = 0.060). Peri-implantitis and post-loading failure comparisons were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional cigarette exposure was associated with larger 12-month peri-implant changes than e-cigarette exposure. Unequal exposure duration, unmeasured previous smoking, self-reported exposure, device heterogeneity, informative implant removal, and absence of a never-smoker group limit causal and absolute-risk interpretation.

Для цитирования: Li Conghui, Tan Yi, Han Lu. Longitudinal comparison of peri-implant clinical and radiographic parameters between e-cigarette users and conventional cigarette smokers.. BMC oral health. 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-026-09469-y.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.