Pediatric dentistry · 2013
Root canal length determination by different methods in primary teeth: an in vivo study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wankhade Abhijit Devidas, Kumar Rakesh, Singh Rajeev Kumar, Chandra Anil
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the accuracy of root canal lengths (RCLs) in primary teeth using different clinical methods.
METHODS: RCLs of 70 extracted human primary single-rooted teeth were estimated in vivo by a calibrated investigator using the electronic apex locator (EAL) method, radiovisiography (RVG), conventional radiography (X-ray), and tactile sensation method (TSM). The teeth were categorized into Group 1 (G1; teeth without physiological root resorption [PRR]); Group 2 (G2; teeth with one-fourth apical PRR); and Group 3 (G3; teeth with one-fourth to three-fourths lingual PRR). RCLs determined by various in vivo methods were compared with the ex vivo actual root canal length method (ARCL), as determined by stereo-microscope. Data obtained were compared using analysis of variance, Newman-Keuls test, and Student's test.
RESULTS: In Groups 1 and 2, the mean RCL determined by EAL was closest to that of the gold standard ARCL, followed by RVG, X-ray, and TSM. In G3, the mean RCL determined by EAL was closest to ARCL, followed by TSM, RVG, and X-ray.
CONCLUSION: A fifth-generation electronic apex locator was found to be useful in accurately determining root canal lengths of primary teeth with or without physiological root resorption.
METHODS: RCLs of 70 extracted human primary single-rooted teeth were estimated in vivo by a calibrated investigator using the electronic apex locator (EAL) method, radiovisiography (RVG), conventional radiography (X-ray), and tactile sensation method (TSM). The teeth were categorized into Group 1 (G1; teeth without physiological root resorption [PRR]); Group 2 (G2; teeth with one-fourth apical PRR); and Group 3 (G3; teeth with one-fourth to three-fourths lingual PRR). RCLs determined by various in vivo methods were compared with the ex vivo actual root canal length method (ARCL), as determined by stereo-microscope. Data obtained were compared using analysis of variance, Newman-Keuls test, and Student's test.
RESULTS: In Groups 1 and 2, the mean RCL determined by EAL was closest to that of the gold standard ARCL, followed by RVG, X-ray, and TSM. In G3, the mean RCL determined by EAL was closest to ARCL, followed by TSM, RVG, and X-ray.
CONCLUSION: A fifth-generation electronic apex locator was found to be useful in accurately determining root canal lengths of primary teeth with or without physiological root resorption.