European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2017
Isolated limb perfusion for locally advanced angiosarcoma in extremities: A multi-centre study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huis In 't Veld E A, Grünhagen D J, Verhoef C, Smith H G, van Akkooi A C J, Jones R, van Coevorden F, Hayes A J, van Houdt W J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Angiosarcomas are rare and aggressive soft-tissue sarcomas. The only potential curative treatment is complete surgical excision. This study reports the outcome of isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with high-dose melphalan and tumour necrosis factor α for locally advanced angiosarcoma.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients who underwent an ILP for angiosarcomas between 1991 and 2016 in three tertiary referral centres were identified from prospectively maintained databases.
RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 18 months (interquartile range 6.1-60.8). Of these patients, 23 (58.9%) patients had a complete response (CR) after ILP, 10 (25.6%) had a partial response, 4 (10.3%) had stable disease and 2 (5.1%) patients had progressive disease immediately after ILP. A total of 22 patients developed local progression (56.4%), whereas nine (23.1%) developed distant metastases. The patients with CR had a significantly prolonged median local progression-free survival (PFS) (15.4 versus 7.3 months, p = 0.015) when compared with non-CR patients, and a trend towards better median overall survival (81.2 versus 14.5 months, p = 0.054). Six patients underwent multiple ILPs, whereby the CR rate of the first, second and third ILPs were 60%, 80% and 67%, respectively. Thirteen (33.3%) patients needed further surgical intervention, consisting of resection in eight patients (20.5%) and amputation in five patients (12.8%).
CONCLUSION: ILP is an effective treatment option for patients with locally advanced angiosarcoma in the extremities, resulting in a high number of CRs, a high limb salvage rate and prolonged local PFS.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients who underwent an ILP for angiosarcomas between 1991 and 2016 in three tertiary referral centres were identified from prospectively maintained databases.
RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 18 months (interquartile range 6.1-60.8). Of these patients, 23 (58.9%) patients had a complete response (CR) after ILP, 10 (25.6%) had a partial response, 4 (10.3%) had stable disease and 2 (5.1%) patients had progressive disease immediately after ILP. A total of 22 patients developed local progression (56.4%), whereas nine (23.1%) developed distant metastases. The patients with CR had a significantly prolonged median local progression-free survival (PFS) (15.4 versus 7.3 months, p = 0.015) when compared with non-CR patients, and a trend towards better median overall survival (81.2 versus 14.5 months, p = 0.054). Six patients underwent multiple ILPs, whereby the CR rate of the first, second and third ILPs were 60%, 80% and 67%, respectively. Thirteen (33.3%) patients needed further surgical intervention, consisting of resection in eight patients (20.5%) and amputation in five patients (12.8%).
CONCLUSION: ILP is an effective treatment option for patients with locally advanced angiosarcoma in the extremities, resulting in a high number of CRs, a high limb salvage rate and prolonged local PFS.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmputation, SurgicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, Cancer, Regional PerfusionDatabases, FactualDisease ProgressionDisease-Free SurvivalExtremitiesFemaleHemangiosarcomaHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLimb SalvageLondonMaleMelphalanMiddle AgedNetherlandsProportional Hazards ModelsRegional Blood FlowRetreatmentRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSoft Tissue NeoplasmsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaYoung Adult