Additional cartilage reinforcement of the annulus in myringoplasty for subtotal perforation.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, graft success, hearing outcome, and complications were compared following the repair of subtotal perforation using a cartilage reinforcement underlay technique (CRUT) versus the traditional cartilage underlay technique (TCUT).

STUDY

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Seventy-six patients with subtotal perforations were prospectively randomized to the CRUT (n = 38) or TCUT (n = 38) group. The graft success rate, hearing outcome, and complications were compared at 12 months.

RESULTS

The mean operation time was 32.9 ± 4.2 (range: 26-47) min in the CRUT group and 51.8 ± 6.3 (range: 48-73) min in the TCUT group (P < 0.001). At 12 months postoperatively, no residual perforation was seen in either group. The graft success rate was 94.7 % (36/38) in the CRUT group and 92.1 % (35/38) in the TCUT group; the difference was not significant (P = 0.643). The postoperative air bone gap (ABG) was significantly improved compared to the preoperative value in both groups, without significant between-group differences in either the preoperative (P = 0.741) or postoperative (P = 0.865) ABG or the mean ABG gain (P = 0.812). Additionally, there were no significant between-group differences in the preoperative (P = 0.887) or postoperative (P = 0.753) mean bone-conduction pure tone average. In the TCUT group, seven (18.4 %) patients developed temporary hypogeusia and two (5.3 %) had external auditory canal scarring. Graft cholesteatoma was not observed in either group.

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of subtotal perforations, lateral reinforcement of the annulus with additional cartilage is simpler than traditional cartilage underlay for achieving graft and hearing success. The technique also does not involve raising the tympanomeatal flap or removing perforation margins.