The Angle orthodontist · 2010
Cone beam computed tomography for assessment of root length and marginal bone level during orthodontic treatment.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lund Henrik, Gröndahl Kerstin, Gröndahl Hans-Göran
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy and precision of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with regard to measurements of root length and marginal bone level in vitro and in vivo during the course of orthodontic treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients (aged 12-18 years) from an ongoing study and a dry skull were examined with CBCT using multiplanar reformatting for measurements of root length and marginal bone level. For in vivo evaluation of changes in root length, an index according to Malmgren et al was used, along with a modification of this method.
RESULTS: The in vitro mean difference between physical and radiographic measurements was 0.05 mm (SD 0.75) for root length and -0.04 mm (SD 0.54) for marginal bone level. In vivo the error was <0.35 mm for root length determinations and <0.40 mm for marginal bone level assessments.
CONCLUSION: Despite changes in tooth positions, the CBCT technique yields a high level of reproducibility, enhancing its usefulness in orthodontic research.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients (aged 12-18 years) from an ongoing study and a dry skull were examined with CBCT using multiplanar reformatting for measurements of root length and marginal bone level. For in vivo evaluation of changes in root length, an index according to Malmgren et al was used, along with a modification of this method.
RESULTS: The in vitro mean difference between physical and radiographic measurements was 0.05 mm (SD 0.75) for root length and -0.04 mm (SD 0.54) for marginal bone level. In vivo the error was <0.35 mm for root length determinations and <0.40 mm for marginal bone level assessments.
CONCLUSION: Despite changes in tooth positions, the CBCT technique yields a high level of reproducibility, enhancing its usefulness in orthodontic research.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAlveolar ProcessCephalometryChildCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMalocclusion, Angle Class IOdontometryOrthodontic AppliancesOrthodontics, CorrectiveRadiographic Image EnhancementReproducibility of ResultsRoot ResorptionSerial ExtractionTooth ApexTooth Root