MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Radiation medicine · 2003

Relationships between head fixation pins for radiosurgery and the skull bone--usefulness of a torque wrench.

Toyota Shun, Seta Hidetoshi, Kubo Hitoshi, Muramatsu Masatoshi, Takeda Kan

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), fixation devices are secured to the patient's head with pins. However, there have been no standards for the use of such pins, which must be inserted with appropriate torque based on the surgeon's clinical judgment. Therefore, the pins may sometimes be tightened excessively and penetrate too deeply into the patient's skull.

PURPOSE: To improve safety in SRS, a torque wrench was used for pin insertion. The usefulness of the torque wrench was then evaluated by examining the relationships between the pins and skull bone and identifying differences according to the wrench used and the patient's bone thickness.

METHODS

CT images of patients who had previously undergone SRS were used to assess the relationships between the pins and skull bone. Differences according to the wrench used and pin insertion site were investigated.

RESULTS

Compared with a standard wrench, use of the torque wrench decreased the insertion depth of pins in the skull bone. In terms of site, pins in the forehead were inserted more deeply. No differences related to the frontal sinus were observed.

CONCLUSION

The use of a torque wrench improved safety during pin insertion for SRS procedures.

Для цитирования: Toyota Shun, Seta Hidetoshi, Kubo Hitoshi, Muramatsu Masatoshi, Takeda Kan. Relationships between head fixation pins for radiosurgery and the skull bone--usefulness of a torque wrench.. Radiation medicine. 2003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.