MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104101

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of otolaryngology · 2023

Comparison of temporalis fascia and cartilage graft over-under myringoplasty for repairing large perforations.

Lou Zhengcai, Lou Zihan, Lv Tian, Chen Zhengnong

Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the operation time, graft success, audiometric outcomes and complications of over-under technique using a temporalis fascia (TMF) and cartilage grafts for the repair of large perforations.

STUDY

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

80 large perforations >2 quadrants of eardrum were prospectively randomized to undergo TMF over-under technique group (TFON, n = 40) or cartilage-perichondrium over-under technique group (CPON, n = 40). The graft success rate, audiometric outcomes, and complications were compared among two groups at 12 months.

RESULTS

The mean operation time was 56.8 ± 4.2 (range:52-71) min in the TFON group and 37.9 ± 2.8 (range: 31-47) min in the CPON group (P < 0.001). The lost follow-up rate was 3 (7.5 %) patients in the TFON group and 2 (5.0 %) patient in the CPON group (P = 0.644). Finally, 37 patients in the TFON group and 38 patients in the CPON group were included in this study. The graft infection rate was 2 (5.4 %) patients in the TFON group and 2 (5.3 %) patient in the CPON group (P = 0.626), all the graft infection resulted in the residual perforation. The remaining residual perforation was 2 (5.4 %) patients in the TFON group and 1 (2.6 %) patient in the CPON group; the re-perforation was 3 (8.1 %) patients in the TFON group and 0 (0.0 %) patient in the CPON group. The graft success rate was 81.1 % (30/37) patients in the TFON group and 92.1 % (35/38) patient in the CPON group. The mean preoperative and 12-month postoperative ABGs were significantly different in any group (P < 0.01). However, there were no significant difference among two groups regardless of pre-or post-ABGs or ABG closure. No lateralization of the graft or blunting was noted in any group. Four (10.8 %)patients developed atelectasis and one (2.7 %) developed the EAC scarring in the TFON group. Graft cholesteatomas was found in 2 (5.4 %) patients in the TFON group and in 5 (13.2 %) patients in the CPON group (P = 0.449). Three (8.1 %) patients had temporary hypogeusia in the TFON group.

CONCLUSION

Although temporalis fascia graft over-under technique obtained similar graft success rates and hearing outcomes for large chronic perforations to the cartilage-perichondrium over-under technique, temporalis fascia graft technique prolonged the operation time and increased the re-perforation and graft atelectasis. Nevertheless, the graft cholesteatomas were comparable among two techniques.

Для цитирования: Lou Zhengcai, Lou Zihan, Lv Tian, Chen Zhengnong. Comparison of temporalis fascia and cartilage graft over-under myringoplasty for repairing large perforations.. American journal of otolaryngology. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104101.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.