Neurosurgery · 2002
Isolated, giant cerebellopontine angle craniopharyngioma in a patient with Gardner syndrome: case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Link Michael J, Driscoll Colin L W, Giannini Caterina
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: We report the case of a 29-year-old man with Gardner syndrome and an isolated, giant cerebellopontine angle craniopharyngioma. Our description of this patient is only the second case report of a craniopharyngioma arising primarily in the cerebellopontine angle.
CLINICAL PRESENTATION: The patient presented with a 1-year history of progressive neurological impairment and headache. On the basis of the patient's history of multiple dermal fibromas, a cranial osteoma, familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), a total abdominal colectomy, and an adenoma of the ampulla of Vater, we diagnosed the patients condition as Gardner syndrome.
INTERVENTION: Magnetic resonance imaging showed a large cerebellopontine angle tumor, which was removed through a suboccipital retromastoid craniotomy. The pathological features were those of an adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma. The patient has done well postoperatively and has no new neurological deficits. A careful retrospective review of the preoperative imaging shows that this tumor was located exclusively in the posterior fossa and was not an extension of a sellar, suprasellar, or clival craniopharyngioma.
CONCLUSION: We present the second reported case of FAP and craniopharyngioma. There is no known genetic link between FAP and craniopharyngioma. Now that the patient has manifested a primary tumor of the central nervous system with FAP, it is unclear whether he should be classified as having Turcot syndrome. For this patient, we recommended vigilant follow-up imaging and forgoing external beam radiotherapy unless there is a documented recurrence of his craniopharyngioma.
CLINICAL PRESENTATION: The patient presented with a 1-year history of progressive neurological impairment and headache. On the basis of the patient's history of multiple dermal fibromas, a cranial osteoma, familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), a total abdominal colectomy, and an adenoma of the ampulla of Vater, we diagnosed the patients condition as Gardner syndrome.
INTERVENTION: Magnetic resonance imaging showed a large cerebellopontine angle tumor, which was removed through a suboccipital retromastoid craniotomy. The pathological features were those of an adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma. The patient has done well postoperatively and has no new neurological deficits. A careful retrospective review of the preoperative imaging shows that this tumor was located exclusively in the posterior fossa and was not an extension of a sellar, suprasellar, or clival craniopharyngioma.
CONCLUSION: We present the second reported case of FAP and craniopharyngioma. There is no known genetic link between FAP and craniopharyngioma. Now that the patient has manifested a primary tumor of the central nervous system with FAP, it is unclear whether he should be classified as having Turcot syndrome. For this patient, we recommended vigilant follow-up imaging and forgoing external beam radiotherapy unless there is a documented recurrence of his craniopharyngioma.