Pediatric neurosurgery · 2021
T2-FLAIR Mismatch Sign and Response to Radiotherapy in Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamasaki Fumiyuki, Nishibuchi Ikuno, Karakawa Shuhei, Kaichi Yoko, Kolakshyapati Manish, Takano Motoki, Yonezawa Ushio, Imano Nobuki, Taguchi Akira, Shimomura Maiko, Taniguchi Maki, Onishi Shumpei, Okada Satoshi, Awai Kazuo, Sugiyama Kazuhiko, Nagata Yasushi
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch sign was previously reported as a diagnostic indicator of diffuse astrocytoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant, and 1p/19q noncodeletion. Subsequently, it was reported that the same findings were observed in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). We investigated the clinical significance of T2-FLAIR mismatch sign in DIPG.
METHODS: Twenty-one patients with DIPG (Male: Female = 12:9) were treated at our institute between 2004 and 2019. All patients were treated with local radiotherapy of 54 Gy/30 fractions. The positive T2-FLAIR mismatch sign was defined if it fulfilled the following criteria: (1) T2-FLAIR mismatch volume was >50% of T2 high volume at nonenhanced area, (2) the FLAIR low lesion is not associated with gadolinium enhancement (inside of enhancement or just outside of enhancement defined as edema), and (3) signal-intensity of FLAIR lowest lesion at tumor is lower than the normal cerebellar cortex.
RESULTS: In our patient series, T2-FLAIR mismatch sign was found in 5 out of 21 patients. Objective response rate of radiotherapy was 100% in patients positive for T2-FLAIR mismatch, while it was 25.0% in patients negative for T2-FLAIR mismatch, and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01, Fisher's exact test). In patients under the age of 18-years, T2-FLAIR mismatch positive had a slightly better prognosis (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon test).
CONCLUSION: T2-FLAIR mismatch sign in DIPG may be an indicator for better response to radiotherapy and a better prognostic factor.
METHODS: Twenty-one patients with DIPG (Male: Female = 12:9) were treated at our institute between 2004 and 2019. All patients were treated with local radiotherapy of 54 Gy/30 fractions. The positive T2-FLAIR mismatch sign was defined if it fulfilled the following criteria: (1) T2-FLAIR mismatch volume was >50% of T2 high volume at nonenhanced area, (2) the FLAIR low lesion is not associated with gadolinium enhancement (inside of enhancement or just outside of enhancement defined as edema), and (3) signal-intensity of FLAIR lowest lesion at tumor is lower than the normal cerebellar cortex.
RESULTS: In our patient series, T2-FLAIR mismatch sign was found in 5 out of 21 patients. Objective response rate of radiotherapy was 100% in patients positive for T2-FLAIR mismatch, while it was 25.0% in patients negative for T2-FLAIR mismatch, and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01, Fisher's exact test). In patients under the age of 18-years, T2-FLAIR mismatch positive had a slightly better prognosis (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon test).
CONCLUSION: T2-FLAIR mismatch sign in DIPG may be an indicator for better response to radiotherapy and a better prognostic factor.