MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.178

Медицинская библиотека · World neurosurgery · 2019

Quantitative Anatomical Comparison of Anterior, Anterolateral and Lateral, Microsurgical and Endoscopic Approaches to the Middle Cranial Fossa.

Saraceno Giorgio, Agosti Edoardo, Qiu Jimmy, Buffoli Barbara, Ferrari Marco, Raffetti Elena, Belotti Francesco, Ravanelli Marco, Mattavelli Davide, Schreiber Alberto, Hirtler Lena, Rodella Luigi F, Maroldi Roberto, Nicolai Piero, Gentili Fred, Kucharczyk Walter, Fontanella Marco M, Doglietto Francesco

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To quantitatively compare different microsurgical and endoscopic approaches to the middle cranial fossa in a preclinical setting with a novel, computer-based research method.

METHODS

Different approaches were performed bilaterally in 5 head and neck specimens that underwent high-resolution computed tomography scans: 5 transcranial anterolateral (supraorbital, mini-pterional, pterional, pterional-transzygomatic, fronto-temporal-orbito-zygomatic) without and with anterior clinoidectomy; 2 transcranial lateral (subtemporal and subtemporal-transzygomatic); 2 endoscopic transnasal (transpterygoid, transpterygoid to infratemporal fossa); 2 endoscopic transorbital (superior eyelid and inferolateral), and endoscopic transmaxillary. A dedicated navigation system was used to quantify surgical working volumes and exposure of different areas of the middle cranial fossa (ApproachViewer, part of GTx-Eyes II, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada). Statistical analysis was performed using a mixed linear model with bootstrap resampling.

RESULTS

Endoscopic transnasal and fronto-temporal-orbito-zygomatic approaches with anterior clinoidectomy showed the largest surgical volumes. Endoscopic approaches allowed a wider exposure of medial anatomical surfaces (e.g., the petrous apex) compared with transcranial ones. Transcranial approaches with larger craniotomies allowed the widest exposure of superomedial anatomical structures (e.g., roof of cavernous sinus). The resection of the zygomatic arch allowed exposure of more medial surfaces with an inferior to superior trajectory.

CONCLUSIONS

This study implemented a novel neuronavigation-based research method to quantitatively compare different approaches to the middle cranial fossa; its results might guide, after consideration of clinical implications, the choice of the neurosurgical approach to different areas of this complex skull base region.

Для цитирования: Saraceno Giorgio, Agosti Edoardo, Qiu Jimmy, Buffoli Barbara, Ferrari Marco, Raffetti Elena, Belotti Francesco, Ravanelli Marco, Mattavelli Davide, Schreiber Alberto, Hirtler Lena, Rodella Luigi F, Maroldi Roberto, Nicolai Piero, Gentili Fred, Kucharczyk Walter, Fontanella Marco M, Doglietto Francesco. Quantitative Anatomical Comparison of Anterior, Anterolateral and Lateral, Microsurgical and Endoscopic Approaches to the Middle Cranial Fossa.. World neurosurgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.178.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.