DOI 10.1097/mao.0000000000002823
Predicting Recidivism for Acquired Cholesteatoma: Evaluation of a Current Staging System.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Assess the utility and prognostic capabilities of the European Academy of Otology and Neurotology (EAONO) and Japanese Otological Society (JOS) cholesteatoma classification system, specifically for retraction pocket cholesteatoma.
STUDY
DESIGN
Retrospective.
SETTING
Tertiary referral hospital.
PATIENTS: Adults and children with retraction pocket cholesteatoma.
INTERVENTIONS: Primary and planned second-look tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of recurrent or residual cholesteatoma at planned second-look surgery. Independent variables of age, gender, size of canal defect, and mucosa status were assessed. Additionally, the cholesteatoma classification, stage, and extent according to the EAONO/JOS system were recorded during the primary surgery.
RESULTS
A total of 125 cases were included. Twelve (9.6%) cases had recidivism over an average time of 7.5 months: the recurrence rate was 4% (n = 5), residual rate was 5% (n = 6), and one patient had both recurrent and residual disease (0.8%). Residual cholesteatoma occurred more frequently in children (p = 0.04, RR = 7.9 [1.0, 63.6]). Supratubal recess (S1) disease was associated with both recurrent cholesteatoma (p = 0.04, RR = 5.9 [1.3, 27.2]) and recidivism (p = 0.01, RR = 4.2 [1.5, 11.9]). Larger canal defects also showed an association with residual disease (p = 0.017).
CONCLUSION
Younger patients and those with large ear canal defects tend to have residual disease at second-look surgery. Supratubal recess disease is also associated with recurrence. Despite the utility of the EAONO/JOS classification and staging system for cholesteatoma description and type, the prognostic value remains uncertain.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.