International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 1999
Quality of life in patients cured from a carcinoma of the head and neck by radiotherapy: the importance of the target volume.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huguenin P U, Taussky D, Moe K, Meister A, Baumert B, Lütolf U M, Glanzmann C
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess the health-related quality of life (QOL) of long-term survivors of carcinomas of different subsites of the head and neck following curative radiotherapy (RT).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients continuously free from recurrence or second primary tumors treated 1988-1994 were contacted 5.1 to 5.9 years after RT and asked to fill in the EORTC QLQ-C30 core questionnaire and the H&N cancer module. RT had been restricted to the glottis (group A; carcinomas of the vocal cord T1-2 N0), or had included bilateral neck nodes and the primary tumor outside the nasopharynx (group B; AJC Stage II to IV) or within the nasopharynx, respectively (group C; Stage II to IV). Response rate was 97% (group A; n = 41), 69% (group B; n = 26) and 71% (group C; n = 12), respectively. The groups were different with respect to age (older in group A), alcohol consumption (absent in group C) and proportion of females (more in group C).
RESULTS: Patients with nasopharyngeal cancer reported the highest morbidity on the H&N module (dry mouth, sticky saliva, trismus, problems with teeth, trouble eating). However, these symptoms did not have a high impact on global QOL or function scores on the QLQ-C30 core questionnaire. Patients in group B reported a lower global QOL but less severe symptoms on the module.
CONCLUSION: The high morbidity of patients treated for a nasopharyngeal cancer may be explained by the location of the target volume which included the bilateral temporo-mandibular joints and the salivary glands. These patients require appropriate care during follow-up and will probably profit most from new RT techniques with sparing of normal tissues.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients continuously free from recurrence or second primary tumors treated 1988-1994 were contacted 5.1 to 5.9 years after RT and asked to fill in the EORTC QLQ-C30 core questionnaire and the H&N cancer module. RT had been restricted to the glottis (group A; carcinomas of the vocal cord T1-2 N0), or had included bilateral neck nodes and the primary tumor outside the nasopharynx (group B; AJC Stage II to IV) or within the nasopharynx, respectively (group C; Stage II to IV). Response rate was 97% (group A; n = 41), 69% (group B; n = 26) and 71% (group C; n = 12), respectively. The groups were different with respect to age (older in group A), alcohol consumption (absent in group C) and proportion of females (more in group C).
RESULTS: Patients with nasopharyngeal cancer reported the highest morbidity on the H&N module (dry mouth, sticky saliva, trismus, problems with teeth, trouble eating). However, these symptoms did not have a high impact on global QOL or function scores on the QLQ-C30 core questionnaire. Patients in group B reported a lower global QOL but less severe symptoms on the module.
CONCLUSION: The high morbidity of patients treated for a nasopharyngeal cancer may be explained by the location of the target volume which included the bilateral temporo-mandibular joints and the salivary glands. These patients require appropriate care during follow-up and will probably profit most from new RT techniques with sparing of normal tissues.