Cornea · 2015
Immunocytochemical Diagnosis of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency: Comparative Analysis of Current Corneal and Conjunctival Biomarkers.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Poli Muriel, Burillon Carole, Auxenfans Celine, Rovere Marie-Rose, Damour Odile
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare corneal and conjunctival biomarkers for immunocytochemical diagnosis of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD).
METHODS: In accordance with the current literature, we selected K12 as the corneal biomarker and K7/K13/K19/MUC5AC as the conjunctival ones. The specificity and accuracy for each biomarker were assessed and compared on 10 healthy subjects and tissues of deceased donors. Twelve eyes of 9 patients clinically suspected of LSCD were enrolled. Epithelial cells (ECs) from the central cornea were collected using impression cytology (IC) and assessed for each biomarker. The presence of conjunctival cells in the central cornea was diagnostic proof of LSCD, whereas the detection of corneal residual cells would quantify the degree of LSCD.
RESULTS: K12 and K7/K13/MUC5AC are, respectively, highly specific of corneal and conjunctival differentiation, whereas K19 is not. Normal corneal ECs are not desquamative enough to be suitable for IC. Among 12 eyes with suspected LSCD, 84% (10 of 12) of IC samples were suitable for analysis. K3/K7/K19 immunostaining was positive in 100%, MUC5AC in 40%, and K12 was never observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical examination can lead to misdiagnosis of LSCD. Immunocytochemical detection of K7/K13 on corneal ECs collected by IC is reproducible, noninvasive, and highly effective in this indication, but without any quantification of the degree of the disease. This time-consuming technique requires skilled technicians and laboratory facilities, reserving it for planned limbal reconstruction.
METHODS: In accordance with the current literature, we selected K12 as the corneal biomarker and K7/K13/K19/MUC5AC as the conjunctival ones. The specificity and accuracy for each biomarker were assessed and compared on 10 healthy subjects and tissues of deceased donors. Twelve eyes of 9 patients clinically suspected of LSCD were enrolled. Epithelial cells (ECs) from the central cornea were collected using impression cytology (IC) and assessed for each biomarker. The presence of conjunctival cells in the central cornea was diagnostic proof of LSCD, whereas the detection of corneal residual cells would quantify the degree of LSCD.
RESULTS: K12 and K7/K13/MUC5AC are, respectively, highly specific of corneal and conjunctival differentiation, whereas K19 is not. Normal corneal ECs are not desquamative enough to be suitable for IC. Among 12 eyes with suspected LSCD, 84% (10 of 12) of IC samples were suitable for analysis. K3/K7/K19 immunostaining was positive in 100%, MUC5AC in 40%, and K12 was never observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical examination can lead to misdiagnosis of LSCD. Immunocytochemical detection of K7/K13 on corneal ECs collected by IC is reproducible, noninvasive, and highly effective in this indication, but without any quantification of the degree of the disease. This time-consuming technique requires skilled technicians and laboratory facilities, reserving it for planned limbal reconstruction.